Search On This Site

Custom Search


It only takes a few moments to share an article, but the person on the other end who reads it might have his life changed forever
Subscribe via RSS



Contact Information: 
Submit: articles [ at ] investmentwatchblog [dot] com 
Advertising: ads [ at ] investmentwatchblog [dot] com 
General: admin [ at ] investmentwatchblog [dot] com

‘Absolutely Not Illegal’!! IRS stalled conservative groups, but gave speedy approval to Obama foundation… ‘IS THIS STILL AMERICA?’


IRS Commissioner: Activity ‘Absolutely Not Illegal’

IRS commissioner Steven Miller said the IRS’s targeting of conservatives “is absolutely not illegal”:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/irs-commissioner-activity-absolutely-not-illegal_724747.html

 

IRS stalled conservative groups, but gave speedy approval to Obama foundation

When the Barack H. Obama Foundation sought tax-exempt status to raise money for good works in Kenya, the Internal Revenue Service provided quick help.

The IRS approved charitable status for the foundation, which was run by President Obama’s brother and named after his father, in about a month’s time. The IRS also agreed to give the group this important financial status retroactively, back to 2009, when it had begun its fundraising.

The 34 days the IRS’s Cincinnati office took to process the foundation’s application stands in contrast to the waits of several months — and sometimes longer than a year — that several conservative groups say they experienced with the same office. Obama has apologized, saying Americans have a right to be angry that the office improperly targeted conservative groups for extra scrutiny.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/irs-stalled-conservative-groups-but-gave-speedy-approval-to-obama-foundation/2013/05/16/90c53e8a-be57-11e2-89c9-3be8095fe767_story.html

 

‘Is this still America?’ Congressional hearing turns into IRS smackdown as disgraced former commissioner and Treasury Inspector General face tea-party scandal questions

  • Appointee in charge of screening tax-exempt applications is now in charge of implementing new Obamacare taxes
  • Ousted Steven Miller defends himself, insists that targeting of conservatives was ‘foolish mistakes,’ not political gamesmanship
  • May 10 leak that launched the scandal was ‘prepared,’ Miller acknowledges
  • Former IRS commissioner testified last year that there was ‘absolutely no targeting’ going on
  • Democrats on the panel blame 2010 ‘Citizens United’ Supreme Court ruling for creating a flood of tax-exemption applications during an election year

The IRS under the Obama administration painted targets on the backs of conservatives beginning in 2010, and ousted acting IRS commissioner Steven Miller apologized to the House Ways and Means Committee on Friday. But members on both sides of the aisle were furious, and castigated him for the mismanagement and political gamesmanship the IRS engaged in on his watch.

Texas Republican congressman Kevin Brady had the harshest criticism for Miller.

‘Is this still America?’ he asked him.

‘Is this government so drunk on power that it would turn its full force, its full might, to harass, and intimidate, and threaten an average American who only wants her voice, their voices heard?’

‘The American public deserves better,’ Miller agreed. But both he and J. Russell George, the Treasury Department’s Inspector General for Tax Administration, insisted that no IRS employees engaged in political witch-hunting.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2326109/Congressional-hearing-turns-IRS-smackdown-disgraced-commissioner-Treasury-Inspector-General-face-tea-party-scandal-questions.html#ixzz2TZC15YYv
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

59 Total Views 1 Views Today
Did you already share this? No? Share it now:
  • http://www.facebook.com/willy.wally.16144 Willy Wally

    * U.S. Code of Federal Regulations: “…the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives” (28 C.F.R. Section 0.85).
    * Current U.S. national security strategy: “premeditated, politically motivated violence against innocents.”
    * United States Department of Defense: the “calculated use of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or intimidate governments or societies in pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.”
    * British Terrorism Act 2000, defines terrorism so as to include not only attacks on military personnel, but also acts not usually considered violent, such as shutting down a website whose views one dislikes.
    * 1984 U.S. Army training manual says: “Terrorism is the calculated use of violence, or the threat of violence, to produce goals that are political or ideological in nature.”
    * Brian Jenkins: “Terrorism is the use or threatened use of force designed to bring about political change.”
    * Walter Laqueur: “Terrorism constitutes the illegitimate use of force to achieve a political objective when innocent people are targeted.”
    * 1986 Vice-President’s Task Force: “Terrorism is the unlawful use or threat of violence against persons or property to further political or social objectives. It is usually intended to intimidate or coerce a government, individuals or groups, or to modify their behavior or politics.”
    * James M. Poland: “Terrorism is the premeditated, deliberate, systematic murder, mayhem, and threatening of the innocent to create fear and intimidation in order to gain a political or tactical advantage, usually to influence an audience.”

  • Discordian

    I would say it hasn’t been America since the IRS and the IRC and the “income’ tax were created.