BREAKING! Russian Foreign Ministry: US threat to use force against Syria is a ‘direct violation’ of international law, no matter how limited it is

Washington’s threat to use military force against Syria unilaterally is unacceptable, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said in a statement. He urged the US to wait the results of the UN chemical weapons investigation.

Given the lack of evidence, any unilateral military action bypassing the UN Security Council – no matter how limited it is”– would be a direct violation of international law and would undermine the prospects for a political and diplomatic solution to the conflict in Syria and will lead to a new round of confrontation and victims, Lukashevich concluded. 

“Instead of executing the decisions of G8’s summit in Lough Erne and subsequent agreements to submit comprehensive report from experts investigating possible cases of use of chemical weapons in Syria to the UN Security Council, in the absence of any evidence, we hear threats of a strike on Syria,” the statement read.

Lukashevich emphasized that even “US allies” wanted to wait for the completion of the UN chemical expert group “in order to get an unbiased picture of what really happened and decide on further steps in terms of the Syrian crisis.”

Russia calls Obama statements “unacceptable”

Article Continues Below

Any Attack on Syria Would Be Illegal, Increase Sectarianism in Middle East

Vijay Prashad: Possible missile strike against Syria has been a part of the West’s game plan since 1979 to weaken Iran for its independent path, but US military intervention will increase sectarianism in the region and disrupt fragile peace in Lebanon


Without UN security council approval any action against Syria is an illegal act of aggression.
Snip; The UN Charter is clear that any use of force against another state is prohibited, unless this is an action of self-defence or is authorised by the Security Council.With regard to Syria, self-defence is definitely out, as there has been no attack against another state, or even the imminent possibility of such an attack.
– Dr James Green, International Law Expert 

Follow IWB on Facebook and Twitter