A new revelation of the possible course of events to come…
I just realized how “disarming Syria’s chemical weapons” could REALLY be all apart of their plan to still wage war against them… The US Gov’t has been very war hungry since the start, but they have also been dragging their feet… WHY???????
Have they just been waiting for Russia to realize and offer the obvious & practical diplomatic solution of disarming Syria’s chemical weapons???
Notice how the media keeps quoting Obama/Kerry saying “we are willing to hold off on any military strike in Syria” (if they let the UN take control of their weapons), but they are NOT saying they would “completely cancel their plans for ANY military intervention, at a later date.”
*******I don’t think the possibility of US waging war in Syria is even close to being over!*******
Think of the situation this way…
Syria/Iran have been swearing to retaliate and strike Israel if the US strikes Syria. Israel could deal with a few conventional missiles getting through their defense shield, but any successful chemical-weapon attacks would be very bad for them!!
So how brilliant would it be for them to first disarm Syria of their dangerous chemical weapons (playing the diplomatic game & letting things cool down), as soon as Syria/Iran let their military guard down: I predict another type of (convenient) event goes down (false flag) which then gives the US an immediate green light to strike swiftly with no warning!
We all know the US has major interests of waging war in Syria, who wouldn’t first take away their enemy’s chemical-weapons – if they had the opportunity to do so??!??
WHAT DO YOU ALL THINK?
- advertisements -