Documentary: “America: Freedom to Fascism”. There is no law authorizing the income tax, a cabal of jewish international bankers conspiring to enslave America and the world in a tyrannical one world government aka “New World Order”

The Supreme Court ruled that the 16th Amendment did NOT authorize any new tax. All it did was change the way taxes could be apportioned. According to the original Constitution, if the Feds took a tax they had to divide the proceeds equally between all the states. The 16th Amendment changed that, so that, if a Federal tax was imposed on, say, tobacco, certain states might get unequal shares of the revenue. Or collected taxes might go, for instance, to a military contractor.

Let’s repeat this, because it’s important: The Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the 16th Amendment did NOT create any new tax. Meaning: If you were not taxable before the 16th Amendment, you were not taxable after it. (See: Stanton vs. Baltic Mining, 1916.)

And average hard-working Americans were NOT subject to a tax on their labor and wages before it. Hence they’re not subject to a tax after it was passed. That’s not my personal opinion. That’s the Supreme-Fucking-Court.

Article Continues Below
  • Footnote: Another scammy way the IRS cons people is by lying and telling them that their “labor and wages” are the same thing as “income”. Legally, they’re two totally different concepts. Wages are a function of barter: You’re giving something [your time and labor] for an equal exchange of currency. So there’s no element of “profit”. What you’re doing is an exchange. “Income,” by contrast, is characterized by a profit. It’s money you make OFF of money. Like dividends generated by stocks, bonds, interest charged on a loan, or profits from rental properties. The Supreme Court has weighed in more than a dozen times, concluding that labor and wages were a totally different thing from income. It’s why the 16th Amendment was called “The Millionaire’s Tax”. It was imposed on people who generated money through stocks, bonds and rental properties. 99.9% of Americans do NOT earn money in that fashion. They generate it through labor and wages . . . which the 16th Amendment nowhere taxes. “Whatever may constitute income, therefore, must have the essential feature of gain to the recipient. This was true when the Sixteenth Amendment became effective, it was true at the time of Eisner vs. Macomber, it was true under Section 61(a) of the IRS Code of 1954. If there is no gain, there is not income. Congress taxed income not compensation.” (Conner vs. US, 1969). See also: “There is a clear distinction between profit and wages, or a compensation for labor. Compensation for labor (wages) cannot be regarded as profit within the meaning of the law. The word ‘profit,’ as ordinarily used, means the gain made upon any business or investment–a different thing altogether from the mere compensation for labor.” (Oliver vs.Halstead, 1955)



It’s related to Brushaber. See here:

“… It was settled that the provisions of the 16th Amendment conferred no new power of taxation, but simply prohibited the previous complete and plenary power of income taxation possessed by Congress from the beginning from being taken out of the category of indirect taxation to which it inherently belonged, and being placed [240 US 103, 113] in the category of direct taxation subject to apportionment by a consideration of the sources from which the income was derived–that is, by testing the tax not by what it was (a tax on income), but by a mistaken theory deduced from the origins or source of the income taxed.”



h/t Drooperdoo


Follow IWB on Facebook and Twitter

You may also like...