DOJ Leak Exposes Obama’s Plan to Outlaw and Confiscate All Guns!

The DOJ memo states the administration “believes that a gun ban will not work without mandatory gun confiscation,” according to the NRA, and thinks universal background checks “won’t work without requiring national gun registration.”

We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
Views:

66 thoughts on “DOJ Leak Exposes Obama’s Plan to Outlaw and Confiscate All Guns!”

  1. Another fear mongering article completely out if touch with reality.
    The NRA already has the national gun registration. All the Feds have to do
    Is seize the nras gun list and then Wayne la Pierre can come out and say
    See the govt has been keeping a list. Morons think Feds want a list the NRA already has the
    List. Sorry gun addicts but you don’t have the right to own a gun outside a well
    Regulated militia. The second doesn’t apply to an individual outside a well regulated militia.
    The right to use deadly force and protect property and person is protected under the fourth amendment, yes the fourth. The second amendment doesn’t apply to individuals as it says people not persons. The second protects our right for citizen and state to form an armed well regulated militia.
    Hate to break to all these manipulated gun addicts but abolishing the second wouldn’t change any right you have to own a firearm. In fact it is legal to abolish guns as gun proliferation is not well regulated.
    Want to solve the gun problem here is how.
    First mandate an assault rifle to every citizen, and ammo. Next ban all handguns and the need for conceal laws evaporate. A well regulated militia can’t have 1000s of types of models as efficiently supplying the ammo for these is inefficient and can’t be well regulated.
    This is what all gun owners should be preeching not proliferation . Those that oppose this solution are gun addicts and domestic terrorists. The final thing to do is make it illegal for cops to carry a guns with out a one time warrant signed by two judges. No one and I mean NO one is judge jury and executioner , except for on their property.
    The final thing would be to make a mandatory minimum of 6months for killing anyone with a firearm even in self defense. Mandatory min of 30days for carrying said mandated assault rifle in public.
    The only people that oppose this are gun addicts and shills of the NRA.
    Nothing here I wrote has anything to do with hunting or firearm sports, that is another seperate issue and gun addicts love to conflate these two and use it as a straw man.

    Reply
    • Blah, Blah, Blah Go pound sand 🙂 (What part of “shall not infringe” do you NOT understand?)
      It seems you are the “straw man”: here….. 🙂

      Reply
      • What are u talking about awfully selective. The second starts with Well Regulated Militia, the right not to be infringed applies to a well regulated militia. The govt shall not infringe on the states right to and peoples, not persons, right to form a well regulated militia. Omfg how stoopid is this argument u made. The second says people not persons , anyone with common sense and a law degree will agree with me 2:1 or better. Cherry picking a few words is moronic and shows your level of intelligence, doesn’t reflect well on you or these posters that have been drinking the corporate and gift juice to long. Here I just refuted all your nonsense. Funny these gun addicts like to insult judges and the federal govt but a justice and a couple bought judges make a crazy ruling in your interests and now u use this to defend your nonsense hypocritical. I get this crowd doesn’t like the ACLU but them along with many organization and far more lawyers have come to this understand like me. Corporate shills and lobbyists are profiteering of your ignorance and deaths. Selfish selfish selfish

        Reply
          • You support the death of over a million Americans since 1980, when you want proliferation . More people than have died in all Americas wars. U make me sick .

          • What about knives, what about cars and trucks? Hammers kill? These are dangerous weapons am I right? They need to be banned. I say we ban being alive, because living means we’ll probably die one day.

          • New thought! We could ban war! Then we’d have nothing but peace. If we just got together and banned war and put up “war free zone” signs all over the place, then no one could start a war because that would be illegal and they wouldn’t want to to do anything illegal.

    • Try to organize a well-regulated militia, and see how far you get. That is what the OKC Murrah building false-flag was all about. Militias were discredited by the Clinton Regime, which used bombs planted in the parking structure beneath the building to take it down. McVeigh was a patsy, and none of those in the building who said the initial explosion was upwards from beneath their feet were allowed to testify. One witness saw FBI agents around a column in the parking structure the preceding night, but was not allowed to testify. Ret. General Partin, the USAF’s bomb damage assessment expert,
      demonstrated that a Ryder van full of low-explosive enhanced-fertilizer could not collapse the
      building. Your proposed mandated assault rifle (i.e. military rifle, since no civilian assault rifles are sold in the U.S.) would be tantamount to gun control, since that rifle, if you cannot carry it in public to a place to practice it’s use, is useless. You support a mandatory sentence for using a gun in self-defense? Good! I am an expert with a knife. That means I become king of the streets. I killed a thug a year ago with a pocket knife, all the self defense I need. When SHTF, it is all I need to take the weapon of a government shill like yourself, and then I am armed with a gun as backup to my blade. Viva Machete!

      Reply
      • No it would be tantamount to a well regulated gun system. Gun control is not against the law. Heck banning firearms outside a well regulated Militia is technically possible unfortunately.
        The reason y’all are calling me a shill is cause u know I’m right. Right now gun owners have everything they want . My right to be safe and secure from guns in public is infringed. On a scale of no guns to complete proliferation we are on the later complete proliferation. The scale is out of wack cause this is what is most profitable for the gun companies. Wake up omfg people. Would a that shill say we need to abolish the dea and end the drug war and try every politician to serve in govt since 2000 on guilt or innocence. Would a govt shill say bush and Obama are war criminals. Wall Street and to big to fail need to be arrested. The truth of 9/11 needs to be exposed and those prosecuted. Edward Snowden is a patriot and hero, any govt shill wouldn’t say that. Wake up and find a balance before our gun rights are gone. I’m trying to help all you by challenging your propagandists fed beliefs by false narrative and unconstitutional rulings of justices and judges . This is the most common fall back straw man argument that gun addicts not gun owners make. One justice and a couple judges is all u got laughable. These justices are bought corporate NRA shills. And yes the NRA has a national gun registry. Stop watch MSM news omfg . Gun addicts talking to gun addicts can’t challenge themselves. I feel sorry for y’all and am kissed off cause you are going to cause me to loose my ability to buy a gun now. Your playing right into the govts hand. Insult and don’t challenge your beliefs. Addicts don’t like change hey will fight even if it’s not I their interests. Unreal. You are all corporate shills if anyone is a shill.

        Reply
          • I came here to challenge my beliefs and to stir a convo for some solutions and to challenge those that wanted, however I do understand this is a hot point for 2nd amendment trolls. Suxs no real people are on to debate. And all i get is hate and trolls. Some tried to make points but lead in to the name calling eventually. and so far no one is capable of refuting my points other than some shill judges rulings that were bought and paid for by the gun lobby and gun companies. They have made billions now. Time to move on to some real convo with those actually willing to debate and find middle ground. Debate is not this treads strong suit , insulting is however. So sad most of u are so far gone. I’ll pray for all you, thy will be done.
            Good luck in life ……
            Peace out brah!

    • You, Realist, are an obvious federal shill who has blatantly disregarded various Supreme Court decisions and the expressly written opinions of America’s Founding Fathers! I could quote many of them here, but I know you would not be at all interested. Your evil comment about the NRA’s national gun registry is not correct, I might add, as the NRA does not list the sum total of all gun owners! You are an enemy of liberty!

      Reply
      • Those Supreme Court decisions are be and meant to proliferate profits for the gun companies. Non of you understand law… Easy to insult someone when u are ignorant gun addicts holding onto false narratives by corrupt justices and judges. Y’all are the shills not me. Bunch of fools redding this thread thinking I want to abandoned your gun rights. Obviously u didn’t read what I wrote.. All of u are under educated and don’t get law and don’t get how what I say would strengthen the people against the federal govt but continue bashing me and watch you lose your gun rights completely casue u refuse to keep society safe and protect your fellow human . Anyone calling me a shill is not a lawyer and doesn’t really understand the constitution or what I said. I hope the gov takes your guns now . Morons deserve what they get. Guns bibles and self limiting beliefs is what all u have. Bunch if partisan hacks got no clue.
        So much for a rational debate I this blog with these gun addicts that are quick to insult cause they can’t do critical thinking cause it’s easier to get mad and grab a gun rather than a law book.
        Waaaaaa, I’m for gun rights jut not gun addict rights. Addict behavior in these responses. Well most of them. The 2nd amendment propoghanda spewing from your mouth. Wake up , ya I’m a govts shill lmfao right, only gun addicts that illicit same behavior as drug addicts get pissed over this and call names.
        Wonder how many of these responders are from the south or conservative states and how many are religious nutters. All self limiting. Nothing I said talked about takin your guns to protect yourself . But te viserol reaction is no different than a drug addicts response.

        Reply
        • I don’t know if you’re a shill or not, but there’s no doubt you’re an asshole who knows nothing and spouts pure nonsense. You know absolutely nothing of the Constitution, and you have the audacity to call others under educated and morons.

          Reply
          • Can’t come with facts or a debate. Your the one that looks incompetent. Can have a one way debate when you insult. U seem to be the troll and corporate shill protecting the gun companies profits and not the people or constitution.

        • WaaaAa all those million that have died since 1980, more than all our wars. Yup gun proliferation works to keep us safe. Narrow minded self limiting peoples here. Glad I can push your buttons cause u know I’m right and why u are so angry . Sorry u can’t hold a debate with out insulting , good luck .

          Reply
      • Your an obvious corporate shill protecting the gun companies profits.
        These rulings are few and unconstitutional , passed by NRA lobbyists and corporate lobbyists. Callin me a govt shill makes no sense. A constitutional shill yes . But ur ignorance can’t allow u to how your a corporate shill. Our right to protect ourselves is the fourth not the second. The second is a macro scale protection of the people not he person. The fourth is a micro scale protection for the person or individual not the people or group. Omfg. Learn the law and constitution.
        I believe in gun ownership just not gun addict gun laws like we have today. There is nothing sensible about the abuse of the second and fourth amendments and the olds done is the more propoghanda they had been exposed too.
        The precedent these criminal judges set was for the profits of the gun companies.
        One way to help these small businesses that would suffer from the real intent of the second cause they would not be allowed to proliferate handguns only certain model rifles would to turn them into armories for those to store their firearms and handguns that wouldn’t e allowed in public spaces . Those ht have handguns can go shoot them at the range or keep them home.
        Population density control could help those in rural areas. Guns shouldn’t be allowed around populace , if u r rural fine keep your insanity in the open and make very where u carry less safe.

        Reply
    • “Ban all handguns”? Think Chicago. Preeching? Is that anything like what a preacher does?
      Read the Federalist Papers to get some insight to the thinking of our country’s founders. “The shot that was heard around the world” came from a privately owned, as will next time such a shot is heard.
      It must be more comfy in the basement with the warmer weather coming on.

      Reply
    • REALIST!!? Who is? You??? Go somewhere and get a clue! Am I in backwards land? Is this opposite day?
      We need guns to protect ourselves against enemies. Whether they are wild dangerous animals. Whether they wear a uniform and say they are from the government, or whether they are just murdering thieves that want to kill steal and destroy!
      You are not for the people. You are for totalitarian government parenthood. What is wrong with you? Do you know what the number one cause of death was in the 21st century? Tell me if you know, seeing you are very wise! It was democide! Death by government. Governments kill people! Governments kill lots and lots of people. We need guns to keep governments from killing us.
      Lenin took the guns
      Stalin took the guns
      Mao took the guns
      Hilter took the guns
      Castro took the guns

      Reply
  2. Well then Bisexual Berry the Fairy Obama and his Marxist Butt Buddies should stop flapping their lips man up call up their Communist Jack Booted Thugs and Come and Take Them . Or shut the hell up and go back to their bath house and play hide the hot dog .

    Reply
  3. People in this thread aren’t used to someone like me who understands the intent of the laws. It’s hilarious that we’re talking about the second when your right to a firearm is protected by the fourth which has been shredded buthe govt/nsa/dea/fbi/militarized police etc etc yet te straw man argument is the second. Lmfao watching these politicians which are bought corporate shills talk about the second as if it applies to protecting your gun rights is so laughable. Every time I hear a politics say 2nd amendment all I see is profiteering and gun sales go up and first level law thinkers come out the wood work looking so ignorant with their 2nd amendment chants which should be 4th amendment chants. Since the fourth is shredded now they can attack the second. Protect the fourth amendment t to protect the second. But I can’t expect y’all to grasp what I am saying as u have proved yourself incompetent and insulting . Unwilling to engage in a real debate as you are not used to being challenged and can’t assertively communicate. This is the same problem cops have with the public. I guess math and statistics are worthless in this blog as they will be shot down. No one is judge jury and executioner no one.
    There is no such thing as a responsible gun owner, what a falicy.

    Reply
      • I came here to challenge my beliefs and to stir a convo for some solutions and to challenge those that wanted, however I do understand this is a hot point for 2nd amendment trolls. Suxs no real people are on to debate. And all i get is hate and trolls. Some tried to make points but lead in to the name calling eventually. and so far no one is capable of refuting my points other than some shill judges rulings that were bought and paid for by the gun lobby and gun companies. They have made billions now. Time to move on to some real convo with those actually willing to debate and find middle ground. Debate is not this treads strong suit , insulting is however. So sad most of u are so far gone. I’ll pray for all you, thy will be done.
        Good luck in life ……
        Peace out

        Reply
  4. There is no such thing as a responsible gun owner. No one is judge jury and executioner. Corporate and NRA shills proliferate this message that there is such a thing as a responsible gun owner. Propoghanda.
    Cops are supposed to be the most responsible gun owners and look at how irresponsible they have been.
    Guns only kill, knives have other uses.

    Reply
    • No responsible gun owner huh? Guns only kill? Well, my guns must be dysfunctional, just like your dick, because not one of them have killed ANYBODY.

      Reply
      • I came here to challenge my beliefs and to stir a convo for some solutions and to challenge those that wanted, however I do understand this is a hot point for 2nd amendment trolls. Suxs no real people are on to debate. And all i get is hate and trolls. Some tried to make points but lead in to the name calling eventually. and so far no one is capable of refuting my points other than some shill judges rulings that were bought and paid for by the gun lobby and gun companies. They have made billions now. Time to move on to some real convo with those actually willing to debate and find middle ground. Debate is not this treads strong suit , insulting is however. So sad most of u are so far gone. I’ll pray for all you, thy will be done.
        Good luck in life ……
        Peace out douche

        Reply
  5. Realist, what is the definition of ‘well regulated’. What is the definition of ‘person’? You are exposing yourself as a shill by your rhetoric.

    Reply
    • A person in an individual and people are a group , back when the second was written that’s how they used the terms when referring to the public.
      You are lookin like a corporate shill whom supports the profiteering of murderous weapons and defendin the gun companies profits.

      Reply
        • I’ve explained in my other posts what well regulated looks like but since u won’t take the time to read only post let me explain. How many models of firearms does the army have for their main infratry ? Not many, and obviously a state couldn’t afford all the types of models as the federal govt naturally. So well regulated would be for each state to mandate a single model of rifle and handgun or a couple models maybe but not thousands is the point, every abke bodies adult or maybe 15 and over that’s a debate point. Mandate set number of bullets micro chipped or not. Mandate certain number of hours of training held with other in your county. That’s a starting point. Sorry if you can’t buy 1000s of models , disagreeing with this concept can means your a shill for the profiteering gun companies. Something like this but not what we have now. Trying to limit mentally ill people or making a gun registry or some pointless legislation won’t protect all only divide. Fundamentally the intent if the second and fourth need to be returned back from the corporation and lobbyists.

          Reply
        • I came here to challenge my beliefs and to stir a convo for some solutions and to challenge those that wanted, however I do understand this is a hot point for 2nd amendment trolls. Suxs no real people are on to debate. And all i get is hate and trolls. Some tried to make points but lead in to the name calling eventually. and so far no one is capable of refuting my points other than some shill judges rulings that were bought and paid for by the gun lobby and gun companies. They have made billions now. Time to move on to some real convo with those actually willing to debate and find middle ground. Debate is not this treads strong suit , insulting is however. So sad most of u are so far gone. I’ll pray for all you, thy will be done.
          Good luck in life ……
          Peace out !

          Reply
  6. Wow! The reality of this whole gun control issue is apparent in New York. Gun registration won’t work. Therefore using gun registration as a precursor to gun confiscation won’t work. Besides, first, second and fourth amendments only apply in a country ruled by a government that respects the rule of law.
    We are well beyond the point where the government believes that citizens will comply with laws that violate the Constitution. Therefore, force will be required. An event which forms the basis of an internationally accepted pretext for gun confiscation is required. Even our draconian, habitually untruthful elite wants to look well hung when seen in the shower. They know they will eventually be exposed, so the story has to be complicated and plausible.
    The only thing stopping them is that they fear the cost may be too high. Like the Bundy affair, the people may band together and stand against them. That’s why they’re looking for freedoms leadership. The NSA is about collecting info on people who will resist. They read your mail, record your calls, track your purchases and follow your movements. We who vocalize our resistance are already dead.
    The great part is that they don’t realize the joke’s on them. Our future success lies in a concept they cannot grasp. There is no leadership. Liberty lies in the hearts of freedom loving people and as soon as you try to put it out, the fire of resistance grows brighter. It is the human condition to pursue life, liberty and happiness. Like ants, when they stomp down one hill three more emerge.
    They will come. They will win, at first, but eventually even they will want to be free. The storm-troopers will realize that even they will not be able to raise families of their own, buy wholesome food, have a day at the park or travel to grandmas without someones permission. They will come to understand that in repressing freedom in others they enslave themselves.
    Freedom cannot be taken. It must be given up. They can take my life, but they cannot take my freedom. We all die. Meanwhile, how do we live? In fear or in freedom?

    Reply
  7. youtube “michelle Obama a man”. isn’t that special America?
    baseball, apple pie and mr wiggly protruding from the first mr’s lady garden area…

    Reply
  8. All I know is that guns are out of control.
    Guns don’t protect the person or people on a macro level. Sure a gun can make u feel safe on a micro level but it raises the risk of injury forbids u carry around.
    Guns in public need to end. Keep em at home if your in a populated area. Their should be a mandatory minimum for carrying a gun in public.
    If you want to carry guns in public than invoke the second and get your state to form a militia oh wait that big govt huh? Lol so lame.
    Trying to guns from and gun addict not gun owner is like what happens when you try and take drug from an addict , it’s the same damn behaviors. Buy all the guns u want but if u being em in public u go to jail . If no one was allowed not even cops to carry these weapons of mass destructio. In public tier would be no need to carry your gun . Or everyone can have a gun and be terrified to walk down the street and walk on shells around each other hoping I don’t upset u and u freak out and shoot .

    Reply
      • I came here to challenge my beliefs and to stir a convo for some solutions and to challenge those that wanted, however I do understand this is a hot point for 2nd amendment trolls. Suxs no real people are on to debate. And all i get is hate and trolls. Some tried to make points but lead in to the name calling eventually. and so far no one is capable of refuting my points other than some shill judges rulings that were bought and paid for by the gun lobby and gun companies. They have made billions now. Time to move on to some real convo with those actually willing to debate and find middle ground. Debate is not this treads strong suit , insulting is however. So sad most of u are so far gone. I’ll pray for all you, thy will be done.
        Good luck in life ……
        Peace out 🙂

        Reply
    • All your points actually make no sense from a “realist” point of view. I’m not bashing you, just pointing out the obvious flaws in your Mainstream induced logic. Realistically if you could delete all firearms from the world it would be the same place. War, murder, muggings and rape would still exist as it always has, guns did not create these problems. If anything they level the playing field. A 90 pound woman could defend herself easily against a 300 pound man because physical strength is not a factor if she’s armed. And about your ” Keep em at home if your in a populated area” policy. These places are where most criminals will be looking for a mark, and I’m sure they would LOVE to agree with you on this one because it would certainly make their jobs much easier. Most anti-gun advocates love to ignore this simple fact – Criminals do not follow the law. Which is why gun free zones are moronic. It’s like a free all you can eat buffet for the criminally inclined…The real issue is and has been the 2nd Amendment and it’s actual purpose. It’s not for personal defense or home defense. It’s not about hunting or sport target shooting. It has nothing to do with ones right to walk around with a gun. The 2nd Amendment is there to remind our government that we can and will overthrow them if they become corrupt or tyrannical. That we can remove them from office if they ignore any or all of the other Amendments in the Constitution or Bill of Rights. If you truly see yourself as a realist, ask yourself why the powers that be are pushing to kill the 2nd Amendment and why they’re very careful not to hint in any way about it’s true purpose or importance to our founding fathers?

      Reply
  9. Why not deport all who try to change & or oppose the U. S. Constitution & Bill of Rights. These belong to every U.S. Citizen, not a few clowns we have allowed to be in office. With out the people there is no Government of any kind or a war. We the people allow these clowns to rule. Slobodan Miloševi? went out the back door when thousand of citizens came to the front door. Same happen in the Ukraine. Their leader went out the back door and went to Russia. These so call leader are all the same, when we all show up.

    Reply
    • They can have the option of self deporting and being black listed as persona non grata for life with the State Dept., or they can swing in a hangman’s noose.

      Reply
  10. I came here to challenge my beliefs and to stir a convo for some solutionstns. And all i get is hate and trolls. Some tried to make points but lead in to the name calling eventually. and so far no one is capable of refuting my points other than some shill judges rulings that were bought and paid for by the gun lobby and gun companies. They have made billions now. Time to move on to some real convo with those actually willing to debate and find middle ground. Debate is not this treads strong suit , insulting is however. So sad most of u are so far gone. I’ll pray for all you, thy will be done.

    Reply
  11. I came here to challenge my beliefs and to stir a convo for some solutions and to challenge those that wanted, however I do understand this is a hot point for 2nd amendment trolls. Suxs no real people are on to debate. And all i get is hate and trolls. Some tried to make points but lead in to the name calling eventually. and so far no one is capable of refuting my points other than some shill judges rulings that were bought and paid for by the gun lobby and gun companies. They have made billions now. Time to move on to some real convo with those actually willing to debate and find middle ground. Debate is not this treads strong suit , insulting is however. So sad most of u are so far gone. I’ll pray for all you, thy will be done.

    Reply
  12. It is estimated that approximately 20 days, after a total financial collapse, humans will hunt other humans as a food source. What will the gun grabbers do then….or what will they become??

    Reply
  13. I see some want to debate and read into what the second amendment means and all that jazz. This will be made very simple guns are here to stay it will take a civil war to “try” and take them. No one wants that i hope. If they do they should be in a straight jacket. This wouldn’t be fought in some far away place it will be in YOUR front yard with your kids involved.. America would be no more if this happened so debating is a waste of breath its not happening period. Every object known to man of the right size and quantity can kill a person under the right circumstances something to think about. Where does it stop?

    Reply
  14. Obama and most of DC will be hung by their necks and executed for treason before it is all over with. Their Nazification and intentional destruction of America for their Globalist Banker Masonic Illuminati satanist masters, will come to an abrupt end as their necks go “SNAP!”, as their heads disconnect from their bodies. All that pay-off money your masters have given you will never be put to use. Like Hitler, you do not comprehend that your final hour has arrived. Your Globalist Banker masters will swing with you. The robbers and murderers of mankind are who you all are.

    Reply
  15. ADOLF HITLER,passed a law,ANYONE having a weapon would be put to death,SO EVERYONE TURNED THEM IN,and AMERICA is politically correct ,they’ll do the same thing,OR THEIR WIFE will call the police on them,TO SAVE THE CHILDREN you know……..just like it saved the children in germany………….

    Reply
  16. HAHAHA,you guys think its just the federal government whos guilty of TREASON,OH,its way bigger then that,THATS why you can’t win,every government offical in america is GUILTY OF TREASON,and your local police gangs are the worse of them ALL……and they are the ones who PROTECT everyone whos screwing you….BUTT KISSERS DON’T WIN WARS…………….

    Reply

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.