<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>InvestmentWatch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://investmentwatchblog.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com</link>
	<description>InvestmentWatch is a free opinion/analysis provider of the stock market, global economy, environment, and our energy challenges. Real estate, oil, politics, and money.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Recently I wrote that I thought the NAZDAQ would lead, not the DOW and S&amp;P. Today an article that covers ETF&#8217;s had this.</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/recently-i-wrote-that-i-thought-the-nazdaq-would-lead-not-the-dow-and-sp-today-an-article-that-covers-etfs-had-this/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/recently-i-wrote-that-i-thought-the-nazdaq-would-lead-not-the-dow-and-sp-today-an-article-that-covers-etfs-had-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Balance Sheets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Capital Expenditure]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[China C]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dr Ed]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Earnings Surprises]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ed Yardeni]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Etf]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Export Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Global Downturn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Global Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Global One]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Global Trends]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Analysts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Investor Sentiment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lipton]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Minyanville]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nazdaq]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Overseas Exports]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pessimism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Point Of No Return]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Revenue Numbers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Top Performers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Valuations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yardeni Research]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Year Of The Bull]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t focus on the U.S. economy but on the global one. It is fragile but, it will have to grow at some point without us. Either now or after another global downturn, the global economy has to grow without us being a major factor simply because we are past the point of no return. We [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t focus on the U.S. economy but on the global one. It is fragile but, it will have to grow at some point without us. Either now or after another global downturn, the global economy has to grow without us being a major factor simply because we are past the point of no return. We can&#8217;t grow or tax out of this and even a few year delay doesn&#8217;t change the global trends in place.</p>
<p>quote<br />
Dr. Ed Yardeni of Yardeni Research believes that sectors and industries that outperformed and underperformed the market during the first year of the bull market will do so again for this year, writes Josh Lipton for Minyanville. Yardeni says that tech will come out ahead this year and “industry analysts are raising both their 2010 and 2011 estimates as the sector continues to deliver more positive earnings surprises than the other sectors.”</p>
<p>The tech sector’s top performers have some things in common, such as companies that have big global footprints and strong, clean balance sheets. Additionally, valuations look attractive, tech companies are continuing to put up record revenue numbers and capital expenditure may begin to increase.</p>
<p>http://www.etftrends.com/2010/03/why-tech-etfs-may-keep-leading-in-2010.html</p>
<p>Globalization and our 20-30 year decline in our standard of living, buying power and investor sentiment has changed everything about how we look at the market.</p>
<p>However, caution, so many people still think only in terms as if the U.S. is still the most powerful force in the market, that they can still move it short term. Also, we have the European theater to drag the global economy down with and that, when combined with the U.S. could be a major force and it isn&#8217;t looking too great.</p>
<p>Again, the global economy is very fragile but, it has become the market&#8217;s leading force. 76% of the S&#038;P get at least some earning from overseas. Exports to the U.S. are now only about 16% of what China counts on for their export economy and that trend continues to marginalize the U.S. (if the global economy continues to grow).</p>
<p>If the global economy falters, then all the doom and gloomers on the market will be probably vindicated for their pessimism but, that hasn&#8217;t happened yet.</p>
<p>Have your stops in place but, I wouldn&#8217;t be shorting this market yet. As concerned as many are that China&#8217;s &#8220;bubbles&#8221; are ready to break, until they do, like the tech bubble, they can keep expanding longer than many believe possible.</p>
<p>There really is no place without risk and that includes the bond markets and cash. You have to be active in seeking global information everyday that will drive the markets and stocks. Domestic companies could be closing their doors at the same time global companies are hiring and expanding.</p>
<p>&#8220;Be &#8216;alert&#8217; for the world needs more &#8216;lerts.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>- JanPaul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/recently-i-wrote-that-i-thought-the-nazdaq-would-lead-not-the-dow-and-sp-today-an-article-that-covers-etfs-had-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pay attention for a list of companies that are definite shorts in the future:</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/pay-attention-for-a-list-of-companies-that-are-definite-shorts-in-the-future/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/pay-attention-for-a-list-of-companies-that-are-definite-shorts-in-the-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bank Switzerland]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Chief Executive Officer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Electricity Rates]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy Analyst]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Family Fortunes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Gold Mines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Inner Mongolia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Kilowatt Hour]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Managing Family]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mike Ahearn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Private Bank]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Prospectors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Rcm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Siemens Ag]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Solar Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Solar Plants]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sun Power]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Suntech Power Holdings]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Suntech Power Holdings Co]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Solar Prospectors Chase Italian, Israeli ‘Gold Mines’
March 11 (Bloomberg) &#8212; Olivier de Vergnies quit managing family fortunes at Dexia Private Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. in 2008 to run a New York start-up at 100 Wall St. that’s trying to tap riches in solar energy.
The chief executive officer of two-year-old Prime Sun Power Inc. is hiring hundreds [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solar Prospectors Chase Italian, Israeli ‘Gold Mines’</p>
<p>March 11 (Bloomberg) &#8212; Olivier de Vergnies quit managing family fortunes at Dexia Private Bank (Switzerland) Ltd. in 2008 to run a New York start-up at 100 Wall St. that’s trying to tap riches in solar energy.</p>
<p>The chief executive officer of two-year-old Prime Sun Power Inc. is hiring hundreds of workers to build solar plants in Italy, where he can sell electricity for about six times the price paid to coal- and natural gas-fired generators.</p>
<p>Prime Sun and developers across the globe, like prospectors staking gold or oil claims in the American West a century ago, are rushing to Italy, Israel and China to lock in the world’s highest subsidized electricity rates before they’re cut back.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>SunEdison LLC and Siemens AG both announced plans today to build in Italy.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>China is also attracting investors, including First Solar Inc. and Suntech Power Holdings Co., which will earn 2.15 yuan (31 U.S. cents) for each kilowatt-hour, about four times the base price for fossil fuel-generated electricity.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>First Solar, based in Arizona, plans to start building the world’s biggest solar farm in China’s Inner Mongolia region in June. The above-market rates are “critical” to the project, Chief Executive Officer Mike Ahearn said in September.</p>
<p>The solar industry is “built on subsidies,” said James Britland, an alternative energy analyst at Allianz RCM in London. “This is a non-competitive industry that has to be subsidized.”</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>The real opportunity for solar investors will come when the sunnier U.S. states offer bigger incentives, said Matthew Page, who manages about $50 million in alternative-energy shares at Guinness Atkinson Asset Management in London.</p>
<p>“We’re all waiting for the U.S. to take off,” he said.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&#038;sid=aVTGnASbLcHs&#038;@#$%&#038;!=12 ">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&#038;sid=aVTGnASbLcHs&#038;@#$%&#038;!=12 </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/pay-attention-for-a-list-of-companies-that-are-definite-shorts-in-the-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My competitors in Asia keep REDUCING their prices under pressure from arrogant &#8220;sourcing&#8221; managers here in the USA.</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/my-competitors-in-asia-keep-reducing-their-prices-under-pressure-from-arrogant-sourcing-managers-here-in-the-usa/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/my-competitors-in-asia-keep-reducing-their-prices-under-pressure-from-arrogant-sourcing-managers-here-in-the-usa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Debtor Nation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Detriment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Print Money]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Quick Profit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Stable Prices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Three Months]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Usa Today]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We keep watching them bleed red, maybe thinking they will &#8220;make it up in volume&#8221;! Their prices are underwater on a per unit cost and they think they will make it up by selling more! Sounds like the government!
Only they can&#8217;t print money. Meanwhile the sourcing people in this country keep saying they will not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We keep watching them bleed red, maybe thinking they will &#8220;make it up in volume&#8221;! Their prices are underwater on a per unit cost and they think they will make it up by selling more! Sounds like the government!</p>
<p>Only they can&#8217;t print money. Meanwhile the sourcing people in this country keep saying they will not buy unless they get an absurd price point. Well, three months from now I fully expect there to be a major shake out in my industry as one of the top three companies goes out of business, and the third realizes they WILL NOT SURVIVE without price increases. My company? Stable prices, great service, R&#038;D support - we WILL NOT deal with American companies that arrogantly think that price is all that matters - to the detriment of OUR company. Everything in the USA today is SHORT-TERM, QUICK PROFIT! Look where it got the USA - a DEBTOR nation with NO production to speak of!! Great moves Washington and Big Business!</p>
<p>- irishscot2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/my-competitors-in-asia-keep-reducing-their-prices-under-pressure-from-arrogant-sourcing-managers-here-in-the-usa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you are unhappy with your credit card company or your bank, there is an option.</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/if-you-are-unhappy-with-your-credit-card-company-or-your-bank-there-is-an-option/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/if-you-are-unhappy-with-your-credit-card-company-or-your-bank-there-is-an-option/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Aspx]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ceo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Coop]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Credit Card Company]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Credit Unions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Creditunion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dataservices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ncua]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Php]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Quickfind]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Shareholders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Find a credit union. You can almost think of credit unions as the ‘anti-bank”. There is no high paid CEO, and no outside shareholders. Credit unions are owned by the people that have funds on deposit and many are government insured by the NCUA.
http://www.ncua.gov/DataServices/FindCU.aspx
http://www.creditunion.coop/cu_locator/quickfind.php
The banks hate credit unions.
- DRC
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Find a credit union. You can almost think of credit unions as the ‘anti-bank”. There is no high paid CEO, and no outside shareholders. Credit unions are owned by the people that have funds on deposit and many are government insured by the NCUA.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ncua.gov/DataServices/FindCU.aspx">http://www.ncua.gov/DataServices/FindCU.aspx</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.creditunion.coop/cu_locator/quickfind.php">http://www.creditunion.coop/cu_locator/quickfind.php</a></p>
<p>The banks hate credit unions.</p>
<p>- DRC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/if-you-are-unhappy-with-your-credit-card-company-or-your-bank-there-is-an-option/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If each homeowner had to pay the taxes in a lump sum each year, there would be riots.</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/if-each-homeowner-had-to-pay-the-taxes-in-a-lump-sum-each-year-there-would-be-riots/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/if-each-homeowner-had-to-pay-the-taxes-in-a-lump-sum-each-year-there-would-be-riots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Escrow]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Freedom House]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fuel Tax]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hell]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Income Taxes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Log Home]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lump Sum]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Maw]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New Freedom]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Paycheck]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Property Taxes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Refund Money]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Registration Fees]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Riots]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tax Payments]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tax Registration]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Twenty Years]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Weasels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
After twenty years of house payments my wife and I toasted our new freedom of no house payments. The next day we received property taxes &#8220;due and payable!&#8221; They amount to $5,400 a year for a small log home. Now I ask you, who owns that property? Anyone who can take it for non-payment, that&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://www.bbc.co.uk/london/content/images/2008/08/20/poll_tax_430x300.jpg" class="alignnone" width="430" height="300" /></p>
<p>After twenty years of house payments my wife and I toasted our new freedom of no house payments. The next day we received property taxes &#8220;due and payable!&#8221; They amount to $5,400 a year for a small log home. Now I ask you, who owns that property? Anyone who can take it for non-payment, that&#8217;s who owns IT and anything else that is taxable. So our land lord is the County we are subject to the State and the weasels in Washington have no idea of the pressure of taxes at the local level. So maw and I took a ride to get away. We left in our car that costs $700 a year in fuel tax , registration fees&#8230; etc, no end to the taxes, YOU DON&#8221;T OWN ANYTHING BUT THE PEN YOU WRITE THE CHECK WITH>The government owns YOU! Please vote for this &#8220;Hell Plan&#8221; so we can be totally owned.</p>
<p>The reason most American&#8217;s don&#8217;t realize this is because the tax payments are incorporated into the mortgage through escrow (or part of the rent). If each homeowner had to pay the taxes in a lump sum each year, there would be riots.</p>
<p>Same with income tax. It&#8217;s quietly removed from each paycheck so that no one really notices. In fact, we get excited when we get a &#8216;refund&#8217; - money that was ours to begin with. Can you imagine what would happen in income taxes weren&#8217;t withheld, and Americans had to write a check for the full amount every April 15th? Again, there would be riots.</p>
<p>- bout-given-up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/if-each-homeowner-had-to-pay-the-taxes-in-a-lump-sum-each-year-there-would-be-riots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looming Commercial Real Estate Crisis Threatens Small Businesses</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/looming-commercial-real-estate-crisis-threatens-small-businesses/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/looming-commercial-real-estate-crisis-threatens-small-businesses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Loans]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Mortgages]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Real Estate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Community Banks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Oversight]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Delinquency]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Disproportionate Amounts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fallout]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Financial Bailout]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lifeline]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Metropolitan New York]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Oversight Panel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Panel Chair]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Research Group]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Residential Real Estate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Retail Buildings]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Owners]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[March 10, 2010 By Rieva Lesonsky
For many small business owners in the Great Recession, community banks have been a lifeline.
But that lifeline could be about to snap. The Congressional Oversight Panel, which monitors the financial bailout, just released a report on the state of commercial real estate lending—and the news is not good.
“There’s been an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>March 10, 2010 By Rieva Lesonsky</p>
<p>For many small business owners in the Great Recession, community banks have been a lifeline.</p>
<p>But that lifeline could be about to snap. The Congressional Oversight Panel, which monitors the financial bailout, just released a report on the state of commercial real estate lending—and the news is not good.</p>
<p>“There’s been an enormous bubble in commercial real estate, and it has to come down,” panel chair Elizabeth Warren told the Washington Post. “A mortgage crisis like the one that has devastated homeowners is enveloping the nation’s office and retail buildings,” the Post reports. The fallout will hit community banks hard.</p>
<p>In general, large, community banks haven’t been hurt by the residential real estate crisis. But community banks issued higher proportions of commercial mortgages than did the big banks. Some 3,000 community banks have disproportionate amounts of commercial loans relative to their assets, according to the oversight panel’s report. And, as Warren says, “Every dollar [community banks] lose in commercial real estate is a dollar they can’t use for small businesses.”</p>
<p>Areas most at risk? South Florida, metropolitan New York and Washington, DC, lead the nation in the per capita value of commercial real estate currently in foreclosure, default or delinquency, according to research group Real Capital Analytics.</p>
<p>http://smallbiztrends.com/2010/03/looming-commercial-real-estate-crisis-threatens-small-businesses.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/looming-commercial-real-estate-crisis-threatens-small-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This in the Gov. report is interesting.</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/this-in-the-gov-report-is-interesting/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/this-in-the-gov-report-is-interesting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[1 Billion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Allocations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bea]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bonds]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Capital Investment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Debt Investment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Decreases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Earnings]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Equity Capital]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Securities]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Foreigners]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intercompany Debt]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Monetary Fund]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Transactions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Member Countries]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reserve Assets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reserve Currency]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sdrs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Securities Brokers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Special Drawing Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[quote
U.S.-owned assets abroad
U.S.-owned assets abroad increased $294.1 billion in the third quarter,
following a decrease of $37.4 billion in the second.
U.S. claims on foreigners reported by U.S. banks and securities brokers
increased $240.1 billion in the third quarter, following an increase of $27.2
billion in the second. (Examples of these claims are U.S. residents’ deposits at
banks abroad and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quote<br />
U.S.-owned assets abroad</p>
<p>U.S.-owned assets abroad increased $294.1 billion in the third quarter,<br />
following a decrease of $37.4 billion in the second.</p>
<p>U.S. claims on foreigners reported by U.S. banks and securities brokers<br />
increased $240.1 billion in the third quarter, following an increase of $27.2<br />
billion in the second. (Examples of these claims are U.S. residents’ deposits at<br />
banks abroad and loans by U.S. banks and securities brokers to foreigners.)</p>
<p>Net U.S. purchases of foreign securities were $47.8 billion in the third<br />
quarter, down from $92.6 billion in the second. Net U.S. purchases of foreign<br />
stocks were $26.8 billion, down from $37.7 billion. Net U.S. purchases of foreign<br />
bonds were $21.0 billion, down from $54.9 billion.</p>
<p>U.S. direct investment abroad increased $62.7 billion in the third quarter,<br />
following an increase of $47.4 billion in the second. Shifts to increases from<br />
decreases in net equity capital investment and in net intercompany debt investment<br />
abroad were partly offset by a small reduction in reinvested earnings.</p>
<p>U.S. official reserve assets increased $49.0 billion in the third quarter,<br />
following an increase of $3.6 billion in the second. The pickup resulted from<br />
the allocation of $47.6 billion in special drawing rights (SDRs) to the United<br />
States as part of two new allocations of SDRs by the International Monetary Fund<br />
to its member countries.</p>
<p>http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/international/transactions/transnewsrelease.htm</p>
<p>There is a lot more detailed in this report that should be of interest to all, including those who are following our financial condition and overall trends in our economy.</p>
<p>Note that pesky SDR statement. The U.S. is actually supporting the very instrument that many are wanting used to replace the dollar as the global reserve currency.</p>
<p>Remember how Geithner shortly after being appointed said he could support SDR&#8217;s only to say he was misunderstood when his statement caused the markets to move?</p>
<p>Look how the G-20 (not U.K. and U.S.) are supporting gold as a part of the basket the SDR&#8217;s would be valued against.</p>
<p>There are a lot of things going on that aren&#8217;t being covered by the media (so what&#8217;s new about that?) that we should be digging and finding out about if we want to protect our investments from people like Dodd and others in both parties that say one thing and do another.</p>
<p>On that deposits abroad, in a Financial Times interview of Jing Ulrich, she pointed out that there are $9 trillion in deposits in Chinese banks alone by corporations and retailers.</p>
<p>- JanPaul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/this-in-the-gov-report-is-interesting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-Know News - March 11 &#8220;Dollar Dominance Gets a Warning&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/must-know-news-march-11-dollar-dominance-gets-a-warning/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/must-know-news-march-11-dollar-dominance-gets-a-warning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Auto Finance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Budget Address]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Budget Deficit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dominant Role]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Election Year]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Exit Strategy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Deficit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Investors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Global Credit Crunch]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Springfield]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Illinois Workers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John Chambers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ratings Committee]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reserve Currency]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sovereign Ratings]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[State Income Tax]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tax Hike]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Department]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Watchdog Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

1) Gov  seeks 33% tax hike for education, billions in spending cuts (Illinois)

&#8220;SPRINGFIELD &#8212; Uncorking a risky election-year gambit, Gov. Quinn on  Wednesday proposed a 33 percent increase in the state income tax to  avoid &#8220;sacrificing the future of a generation of children.&#8221;
Quinn&#8217;s push to hike the tax on Illinois workers&#8217; paychecks from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="content">
<ul>
<li>1) <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/maxedout/2096771,CST-NWS-QUINN11.article"><strong><span>Gov  seeks 33% tax hike for education, billions in spending cuts</span></strong></a> (Illinois)</li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;SPRINGFIELD &#8212; Uncorking a risky election-year gambit, Gov. Quinn on  Wednesday proposed a 33 percent increase in the state income tax to  avoid &#8220;sacrificing the future of a generation of children.&#8221;</p>
<p>Quinn&#8217;s push to hike the tax on Illinois workers&#8217; paychecks from 3  percent to 4 percent came with a promise to devote all of the $2.8  billion in new annual revenues to education, staving off the $1.3  billion in cuts the governor aimed at the state&#8217;s schoolchildren and  university students if the tax hike doesn&#8217;t materialize.</p>
<p>&#8220;I believe this 1 percent for education makes sense, and I think the  people of Illinois will understand,&#8221; the governor said during a  20-minute budget address to both chambers of the General Assembly.</p>
<p>The tax hike would deal with only a portion of the historic $13  billion budget deficit that has made Illinois one of the least-solvent  states.&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>2) <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Watchdog-GMAC-bailout-could-apf-3397118710.html?x=0&amp;sec=topStories&amp;pos=3&amp;asset=&amp;ccode="><strong><span>Watchdog:  GMAC bailout could cost taxpayers $6.3B</span></strong></a></li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;WASHINGTON (AP) &#8212; The Treasury Department sank billions into auto  finance giant GMAC Inc. without an exit strategy or proof the company  was viable &#8212; a decision that could cost taxpayers $6.3 billion, a new  watchdog report says.&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>3) <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703701004575113151234368416.html?mod=WSJ-hpp-LEFTWhatsNewsCollection"><strong><span>Dollar  Dominance Gets a Warning</span></strong></a></li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;The dollar&#8217;s dominant role as global reserve currency hasn&#8217;t been  challenged by the global credit crunch, Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s said in a  report published Thursday. But the ratings firm warned that the U.S.  can&#8217;t take the dollar&#8217;s role for granted. Unless it addresses its fiscal  deficit and debt, foreign investors could start to reduce dollar  holdings, sending rates sharply higher and undermining the economy,  which in turn could threaten the U.S.&#8217;s triple-A rating.</p>
<p>&#8220;The will isn&#8217;t there yet, but we think it will come,&#8221; said John  Chambers, the chairman of S&amp;P&#8217;s sovereign-ratings committee,  referring to the U.S. government&#8217;s commitment to rein in its deficit.  Mr. Chambers said the 2010 budget, presented last month, was  disappointing, but he expects a &#8220;more-robust fiscal consolidation plan&#8221;  to emerge after this year&#8217;s midterm congressional elections.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.3A) <a id="MAA4AEgAUAJqAnVz" href="http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=10069486" target="_blank">US Dollar Still Rules, but Debt Level a Risk: S&amp;P</a> ABC  News</p>
<ul>
<li>4) <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/world-business/sovereign-debt-crisis-may-deepen-pimco-20100311-q11u.html"><strong><span>Sovereign  debt crisis may deepen: Pimco</span></strong></a></li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;Mohamed El-Erian, whose company runs the world’s biggest mutual  fund, said deteriorating public finances around the world may affect the  global economy more than is currently realised.</p>
<p>“The importance of the shock to public finances in advanced economies  is not yet sufficiently appreciated and understood,” El-Erian, co-chief  investment officer at Pacific Investment Management Co, wrote in an  article on the Financial Times website.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Governments may have to raise taxes and slash spending to cope with  swelling deficits after nations including the US borrowed unprecedented  amounts to stave off the global financial crisis, said El-Erian, who  shares his job title with Bill Gross.</p>
<p>A failure to carry out fiscal measures in time would raise the  possibility of governments seeking to eliminate excessive debt through  inflation or default, he said.&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>5) <a href="http://imarketnews.com/node/10033"><strong><span>China  Regulator Warns Banks On Western Debt Probs, Exits</span></strong></a></li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;BEIJING (MNI) - China&#8217;s banking regulator warned domestic lenders  Thursday of increasingly complicated global economic and financial  conditions, in part the result of problems western countries are having  with their sovereign debt issues as well as the timing of exit  strategies from stimulus policies.</p>
<p>China Banking Regulatory Commission director Liu Mingkang said in a  release that banks need to tighten up their risk management as a result  of the increasing difficulties facing the world.</p>
<p>&#8220;Sovereign debt problems with developed western countries, high  unemployment rates, international trade protectionism and exits from  economic stimulus are complicating world economic and financial  conditions,&#8221; Liu told major banks in a meeting. &#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>6) <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-11/european-debt-to-reach-1-4-trillion-euros-s-p-says-update1-.html"><strong><span>European  Debt to Reach 1.4 Trillion Euros, S&amp;P Says</span></strong></a></li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;March 11 (Bloomberg) &#8212; European government borrowing will probably  rise to a record 1.45 trillion ($2 trillion) euros this year to fund  fiscal stimulus measures designed to revive growth, Standard &amp;  Poor’s said.</p>
<p>Borrowing will probably climb about 52 billion euros, or 4 percent,  from 1.39 trillion euros in 2009, which was also a record, S&amp;P said  in a statement today. The cost of raising the cash will also rise as the  phasing out of stimulus measures and central bank purchases reduce  demand for bonds and push yields higher, according to the ratings  company.&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>7) <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2010/03/08/daily48.html"><strong><span>Arizona  exports drop 30 percent from 2008</span></strong></a></li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;Arizona exports dropped by $5.8 billion in 2009 with the recession  taking a toll on cooper, computer and semiconductor trade.</p>
<p>Arizona exports totaled just over $14 billion in 2009, according to  U.S. Department of Commerce. That is down 30 percent from $19.8 billion  in 2008. It’s also the lowest level since 2003.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;California exports fell to $120 billion in 2009 from $145 billion in  2008 — a 17 percent drop, according to the commerce department.</p>
<p>U.S. total exports went from $1.3 trillion in 2008 to $1.1 trillion  in 2009.</p>
<p>Foreign imports to the U.S. came in at $1.6 trillion in 2009 compared  to $2.1 trillion in 2008.&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>8) <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100311-706203.html?mod=WSJ_World_MIDDLEHeadlinesEurope"><strong><span>German  2009 Public Debt Climbs 7.1% TO EUR1.69T, 15-Year High</span></strong></a></li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;BERLIN (Dow Jones)&#8211;Germany&#8217;s total public debt climbed 7.1% to  EUR1.69 trillion in 2009, federal data showed Thursday, the highest  yearly increase in 15 years.</p>
<p>The federal statistical office in Wiesbaden said EUR36 billion in  stimulus funding deployed to combat the economic crisis led the federal  government&#8217;s 6.9% debt increase over 2009, pushing its total to just  over EUR1 trillion.</p>
<p>The debt of Germany&#8217;s 16 states last year climbed even more  drastically last, by 8.5%, to EUR526 billion, the office said.</p>
<p>In the 20 years since German reunification, the total public debt  increase for 2009 was surpassed only by a EUR171 billion yearly bump in  1995. &#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>9) <a href="http://www.domain-b.com/economy/worldeconomy/20100311_us_government.html"><strong><span>US  monthly deficit at record 220.9 billion in February news</span></strong></a></li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;The US government&#8217;s monthly budget deficit rose to a record $220.9  billion in February 2010, the treasury department said today.</p>
<p>This brings the total US government deficit for the first five months  of the current fiscal (October-February 2009-10) to $651 billion,  compared with a $589 billion deficit in the similar period of the  previous fiscal.</p>
<p>The February budget deficit is up 14 per cent year-on-year and is the  biggest monthly shortfall in US history.&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>10) <a href="http://www.forexyard.com/en/news/Russia-set-to-overshoot-on-budget-deficit-sources-2010-03-10T142139Z"><strong><span>Russia  set to overshoot on budget deficit -sources</span></strong></a></li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;MOSCOW, March 10 (Reuters) - Russia is struggling to balance next  year&#8217;s budget, and even with strict spending cuts looks unlikely to cut  its deficit to the planned 4 percent of gross domestic product (GDP),  sources told Reuters on Wednesday. Russia dipped into the red for the  first time in a decade last year, as high spending to help the economy  out of recession and sharp fall in budget revenues caused a 5.9 percent  deficit.&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>11) <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-11/detroit-sells-250-million-without-recent-disclosure-filings.html"><strong><span>Detroit  Sells $250 Million Without Recent Disclosure Filings</span></strong></a></li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;March 11 (Bloomberg) &#8212; Detroit, the largest U.S. city whose debt is  rated below investment grade, will ask investors today to buy $250  million of its debt without having filed annual financial reports on  time for five years.</p>
<p>The city, which warned investors in its preliminary official  statement of the possibility of filing for Chapter 9 bankruptcy  protection, is providing a June 30, 2008, financial statement, its most  recent, to investors. A fiscal 2009 report is expected to be complete by  May 31, said city spokesman Dan Lijana, in an e-mail.</p>
<p>“This issue is not for the faint of heart,” said Richard Ciccarone,  chief research officer of Oak Brook, Illinois-based McDonnell Investment  Management, which oversees $6.8 billion of municipal debt. “It  certainly raises eyebrows.”&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>12) <a href="http://thestatecom.typepad.com/ygatoday/2010/03/report-feds-could-take-over-sc-jobless-fund.html"><strong><span>Report:  Feds could take over S.C. jobless fund</span></strong></a></li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;South Carolina must quickly take steps to stop the billion-dollar  bleeding within its bankrupt Unemployment Insurance fund, lawmakers were  told Wednesday, or the consequences could be great.</p>
<p>For one thing, the state risks losing control of the unemployment  insurance system to the federal government, due to its unpaid debt to  Washington, which now stands at more than $773 million, and counting.</p>
<p>The Lucas Group, a Boston-based consultant, warned members of the  Senate Labor, Commerce, and Industry Committee that a federal takeover,  made possible when the state&#8217;s unemployment insurance system is indebted  to the federal government for two consecutive years, would likely mean  an across the board hike in employment taxes on S.C. employers.</p>
<p>Each week, the state&#8217;s debt to the federal government grows by $16  million due to the state&#8217;s inability to afford unemployment benefits.&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>13) <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-wi-wisconsin-unemployment,0,5430847.story"><strong><span>Unemployment  benefit cuts, higher taxes for Wis. business projected to deal with  shortfall</span></strong></a></li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;In 2007, before the recession started, less than $1 billion was paid  to the unemployed in Wisconsin who were eligible for up to 26 weeks of  benefits.</p>
<p>In 2009, benefits could be tapped for up to 93 weeks and the state  paid out $3.1 billion, more than triple what it did two years prior.</p>
<p>Wisconsin&#8217;s debt to the federal government is expected to double from  the roughly $1.2 billion that is owed now to nearly $2.4 billion by  2014, said Hal Bergan, administrator of Wisconsin&#8217;s unemployment  insurance program.</p>
<p>Paying that off will require both a reduction in benefits and higher  business taxes, Gassman said.&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>14) <a id="MAA4AEgkUABqAnVz" href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/35777695/" target="_blank"><strong><span>States, Cities Likely to Slash Jobs As  Stimulus Dwindles</span></strong></a> (CNBC)</li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;&#8221;This is a completely unprecedented crisis,&#8221; says Ethan Pollack of  the Economic Policy Institute. &#8220;The budget cuts are going to get more  and more severe.&#8221;</p>
<p>The main trigger will be the winding down of the massive America  Recovery and Reinvestment Act, better know as the federal stimulus plan.  Tepid to modest economic growth will also hurt.</p>
<p>&#8220;A lot of states didn’t go through with the layoffs that were  expected because of the stimulus,&#8221; says Christian Weller, who  specializes in economics and public policy for the University of  Massachusetts and the Center for American Progress.</p>
<p>The federal government is spending more, not less, so its workers  won&#8217;t be affected by the end of the stimulus program. Still, federal  employees represent a relatively small percertage of all government  workers, with state and local workers making up the biggest portion.&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>15) <a id="MAA4AEgbUABqAnVz" href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-11/shun-spain-on-death-by-1-000-cuts-merrill-says-update1-.html" target="_blank"><strong><span>Shun Spain on &#8216;Death by 1000 Cuts,&#8217;  Merrill Says</span></strong></a></li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;March 11 (Bloomberg) &#8212; Investors should avoid Spain’s bonds as the  euro region’s highest levels of joblessness stifle the country’s ability  to cut its budget deficit, according to Invesco Ltd. and Bank of  America Corp.’s Merrill Lynch unit.</p>
<p>Spanish debt isn’t yielding enough to compensate investors for buying  the bonds of a country with the euro region’s third- largest budget  deficit, according to Axel Blase, a fund manager in Frankfurt at  Invesco. Investors receive a 68 basis-point yield premium for holding  Spanish 10-year bonds rather than German bunds, compared with 309 basis  points for Greek debt.&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>16) <a href="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/virginia-state-police-help-with-budget-crunch/"><strong><span>Virginia  State Police Help With Budget Crunch</span></strong></a> (From March 9)</li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;A federally funded ticketing blitz in the state of Virginia landed a  total of 6996 traffic tickets this weekend. The blitz, dubbed  “Operation Air, Land &amp; Speed” coincided with frantic efforts by  state officials to close a$2.2 billion budget deficit. Supervisors  ordered state troopers to saturate Interstates 81 and 95 to issue as  many tickets as humanly possible over the space of two days.&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>17) <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-10/n-j-s-christie-may-propose-11-budget-of-25-billion-to-27-bln.html"><strong><span>Christie  May Propose Cutting N.J. Budget to $25 Bln</span></strong></a> (A mack  truck through the eye of a needle)</li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;“The things I’m going to propose next week are going to anger  people,” Christie said yesterday at a town hall meeting in Haddon  Heights. “But I will tell you that it’s going to be fair. We will cut  everyone. I’m just trying to fix the problems we have. I would love to  play Santa Claus, but I can’t.”&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Christie’s plan for next fiscal year may eliminate or scale back the  state’s $1.1 billion property-tax rebate program, which gave more than 1  million New Jersey homeowners checks averaging $1,000 last year. The  state’s highest-in-the-nation real estate levies averaged $7,281 last  year, up from $7,045 in 2008, according to data released Feb. 26.</p>
<p>The new governor has also warned New Jersey’s almost 600 school  districts to plan for a 15 percent cut in state aid and told  municipalities they also face a reduction in funding. The governor also  will seek a reduction of charity care reimbursements to hospitals, one  of the people familiar said. New Jersey’s constitution requires a budget  that balances spending with projected revenue.</p>
<p>“New Jersey has never seen a challenge like it’s seeing this year.  It’s stunning,” said Senator Kevin O’Toole, a Republican from Wayne on  the budget committee. “Forget the one about a camel through the eye of a  needle. We’re dealing with a Mack truck.”&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>18) <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2010/03/11/2010-03-11_big_ax_looming_at_the_fdny_threat_of_1000_layoffs_closing_of_62_fire_companies.html"><strong><span>Big  ax looming at the FDNY: Threat of 1,000 layoffs, closing of 62 fire  companies</span></strong></a> (NY)</li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;The FDNY is bracing for doomsday.</p>
<p>The department will be forced to close a staggering 62 fire companies  and lay off more than 1,000 firefighters if the bad-news state budget  becomes reality, Commissioner Salvatore Cassano told the City Council  Wednesday.</p>
<p>&#8220;We would be very, very taxed,&#8221; warned a grim-faced Cassano. &#8220;Our  operations would be impacted and every neighborhood in this city would  feel the effect.&#8221;</p>
<p>Even if lawmakers in Albany - already facing an April 1 deadline and a  $9 billion budget gap - find a way to pump in more cash, the city&#8217;s  fiscal woes may still force the FDNY to shutter 20 companies, Cassano  warned.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re going to try not to close a single company or a single  firehouse,&#8221; Cassano told the Fire and Criminal Justice Services  Committee, &#8220;but if we have to, we will.&#8221;"</p>
<ul>
<li>19) <a href="http://www.modbee.com/2010/03/10/1083030/modesto-city-schools-asking-for.html"><strong><span>Modesto  City Schools asking for 16% pay cut</span></strong></a> (CA)</li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;370 teachers and 67 managers to get layoff warnings</p>
<p>Salary reductions of about 16 percent were proposed Wednesday by  Modesto City Schools trustees as they began what undoubtedly will be  tough negotiations with the district&#8217;s employee unions.</p>
<p>The initial bargaining proposals were greeted with dismay by  employees, especially because the schools started handing out 370 layoff  notices to teachers Wednesday.</p>
<p>Trustees also voted to issue layoff warnings to 67 managers, and  they&#8217;re expected to hand out notices to perhaps hundreds of nonteaching  staff members this spring.</p>
<p>The drastic measures are triggered by declining student enrollment  and shrinking funding, forcing the district to slash $25 million from  next year&#8217;s budget.</p>
<p>&#8220;This district has been falling apart day by day, week by week, year  by year. God help us all,&#8221; said Aaron Castro, president of the union  that represents the district&#8217;s non-teaching staff. &#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li>20) <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-10/silverstein-may-default-on-debt-for-575-lexington-fitch-says.html"><strong><span>Silverstein  May Default on Debt for 575 Lexington</span></strong></a></li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;March 10 (Bloomberg) &#8212; New York developer Larry Silverstein, who  teamed with the California State Teachers Retirement System to buy a  35-story skyscraper in 2006, now faces “imminent default” on debt tied  to the property, Fitch Ratings said today.&#8221;</p>
<ul>
<li> 21) <a href="http://www.boston.com/business/articles/2010/03/11/columbus_center_developer_pulls_the_plug/">Columbus  Center’s plug pulled</a> (Calpers was lead equity partner)</li>
</ul>
<p>&#8220;While WinnCompanies, and its former chief executive, Arthur Winn,  have long been the local public face of the project, Calpers is the lead  equity partner and has been making decisions on the project over the  past several years. The development team previously estimated it had  spent more than $120 million on the proposed project.&#8221;</p>
<p><a id="MAA4AEhaUABqAnVz" href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/DC-headed-for-another-financial-meltdown-87267017.html" target="_blank"><strong><span>DC headed for another financial meltdown</span></strong></a> (Opinion&#8230;only  18 days of working capital?)</p>
<p><a id="MAA4AEhaUABqAnVz" href="http://metrowny.com/blogs/archives/381-DiNAPOLI-NYC-Faces-Budget-Risks-of-2-Billion-75b0xw00d.html" target="_blank"><span>DiNAPOLI: NYC Faces Budget Risks of $2 <strong>Billion</strong></span></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_14652060"><strong><span>Colo.  public schools need $18 billion in construction and maintenance, report  finds</span></strong></a></p>
<p><a id="MAA4AEhXUABqAnVz" href="http://money.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=1026323" target="_blank"><span>Violence erupts at Greek demonstrations</span></a></p>
<p><a id="MAA4AEgFUABqAnVz" href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-10/jpmorgan-top-u-s-banks-may-charge-off-196-billion-moody-s.html" target="_blank">JPMorgan, Top US Banks May Charge Off $196 Billion: <strong>Moody&#8217;s</strong></a></p>
<p><a id="MAA4AEgoUABqAnVz" href="http://www.herald-dispatch.com/news/briefs/x879455538/Ky-House-passes-budget-after-lengthy-floor-debate" target="_blank"><strong><span>Ky. House passes budget after lengthy  floor debate</span></strong></a> ($2.2 billion in borrowing)</p>
<p><a id="MAA4AEgAUABqAnVz" href="http://www.canada.com/business/Rising+debt+time+bomb/2670283/story.html" target="_blank"><strong><span>Rising debt a &#8216;time bomb&#8217;</span></strong></a> (Canada)</p>
<p><a id="MAA4AEgvUABqAnVz" href="http://www.streetinsider.com/Analyst+Comments/Moodys+Says+Many+U.S.+Will+Remain+Unprofitable+in+2010/5427063.html" target="_blank"><span>Moody&#8217;s Says Many US Banks Will Remain  Unprofitable in 2010</span></a></p>
<p><a id="MAA4AEghUAFqAnVz" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62A05X20100311" target="_blank"><span>California revenue jumps, tax refunds should be  paid on time</span></a> but <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/crime-courts/ci_14650455"><strong><span>Despite  more good news for California&#8217;s finances, state may delay $600 million  in payments</span></strong></a></p>
<p><a id="MAA4AEgAUABqAnVz" href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2010/03/11/2010-03-11_ravitch_budget_mess_too_big_to_fix_in_1_yr.html" target="_blank"><span>NewsLt. Gov. Richard Ravitch: New York <strong>budget</strong> mess too big to fix in one year</span></a></p>
<p><a id="MAA4AEhKUABqAnVz" href="http://www.loansafe.org/us-bankruptcy-court-filings-rise-31-9-in-2009" target="_blank"><span>US bankruptcy court filings rise 31.9% in 2009</span></a></p>
<p><a id="MAA4AEhYUABqAnVz" href="http://www.pru.co.uk/guides_tools/articles/19661779-DB-pension-schem/" target="_blank"><strong><span>DB pension scheme deficits &#8216;may be  affected by further QE&#8217;</span></strong></a> (UK)</p>
<p><a id="MAA4AEgiUABqAnVz" href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2010/03/kansas-city-closes-26-schools-to-meet-50-million-budget-shortfall/1" target="_blank"><span>Kansas City closes 26 schools to meet $50 million  <strong>budget</strong> shortfall</span></a></p>
<p><a id="MAA4AEgAUABqAnVz" href="http://www.knx1070.com/Metrolink-Service-To-Be-Cut/6550830" target="_blank"><strong><span>Metrolink Service To Be Cut</span></strong></a> (CA)</p>
<p><a id="MAA4AEhFUABqAnVz" href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/stories/2010/mar/11/school-districts-pull-belts-tighter/" target="_blank"><span>Poway schools to cut more than 200 teachers</span></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_14649376"><strong><span>Mt.  Diablo school board cuts $48.8 million, OKs 200 layoffs, sets $348  million bond vote in June</span></strong></a></p>
<p><a id="MAA4AEgdUABqAnVz" href="http://www.9news.com/seenon9news/article.aspx?storyid=134342&amp;catid=509" target="_blank"><strong><span>CU looking at hiking tuition by 9 percent</span></strong></a> (Colorado)</p>
<p><a id="MAA4AEhLUABqAnVz" href="http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/03/nj_gov_chris_christie_to_annou.html" target="_blank"><span>NJ Gov. Chris Christie plans privatization of as  many as 2000 state jobs</span></a></p>
<p><a id="MAA4AEgdUABqAnVz" href="http://www.reedconstructiondata.com/news/2010/03/nonresidential-building-construction-drops-since-oct-2008/" target="_blank"><span>Nonresidential Building Construction Drops 22%  Since October 2008</span></a></p>
<p><a id="MAA4AEgwUABqAnVz" href="http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6722394.html" target="_blank"><strong><span>San Jose PL Could Lose 35% of Budget, Lay  Off More than 100 Staff</span></strong></a> (public library)</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Foreclosure-rates-up-by-apf-1830270269.html?x=0&amp;sec=topStories&amp;pos=2&amp;asset=&amp;ccode="><strong><span>US  foreclosures rise 6 percent in February, smallest yearly increase in 4  years</span></strong></a></p>
<p><a id="MAA4AEhBUABqAnVz" href="http://www.times-herald.com/local/Seabaugh-proposes-cutting-19-superior-court-judges-1036700" target="_blank"><strong><span>Seabaugh proposes cutting 19 superior  court judges</span></strong></a> (GA)</p>
<p>- Saxplayer00o1</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/must-know-news-march-11-dollar-dominance-gets-a-warning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A very good explaination of what is happening to the economy.</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/a-very-good-explaination-of-what-is-happening-to-the-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/a-very-good-explaination-of-what-is-happening-to-the-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Balance Sheets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ben Bernanke]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business Failures]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Debt Levels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Debt Obligations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Debts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Deficit Spending]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Deflation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Deflationary Pressure]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dilemma]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Explaination]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Government Deficit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hyperinflation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Salvage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Scarcity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sisyphean Task]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Source Feed]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tax Receipts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Us Federal Reserve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rising prices for imported goods (energy in particular) and a scarcity of money in the domestic US economy is a formula for business failures and debt defaults
&#8211;
Bernanke&#8217;s Dilemma: Hyperinflation and the U.S. Dollar
Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the US Federal Reserve, faces a Sisyphean task because US banks are experiencing debt deflation and, because lending is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rising prices for imported goods (energy in particular) and a scarcity of money in the domestic US economy is a formula for business failures and debt defaults</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
<p>Bernanke&#8217;s Dilemma: Hyperinflation and the U.S. Dollar<br />
Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the US Federal Reserve, faces a Sisyphean task because US banks are experiencing debt deflation and, because lending is now at much lower levels, monetary deflation is encumbering the domestic US economy as existing debts continue to be serviced. Government deficit spending can only offset lower consumer spending to a degree, and the mushrooming debt of the US government raises the question of whether the US can repay or roll over its debt obligations, given that tax receipts are likely to fall.</p>
<p>Despite deflationary pressure, the value of the US dollar is in a downtrend trend pointing to higher prices for imported goods and energy. Devaluing the US dollar will reduce the value of debts in real terms, thus it can make debt levels sustainable, but higher prices will exacerbate debt defaults, worsening the condition of US banks. Mr. Bernanke’s dilemma is how to salvage the balance sheets of US banks without sparking high inflation or unleashing hyperinflation.</p>
<p><a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/192916-bernanke-s-dilemma-hyperinflation-and-the-u-s-dollar?source=feed#comments_header">http://seekingalpha.com/article/192916-bernanke-s-dilemma-hyperinflation-and-the-u-s-dollar?source=feed#comments_header</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/a-very-good-explaination-of-what-is-happening-to-the-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duration Gap</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/duration-gap/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/duration-gap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Accounting Term]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Asset Base]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Asset Liability]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Assets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Assets And Liabilities]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Assetts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bank Assets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cash Inflows]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conversely]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Credit Money]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Deposit Money]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Derivatives]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Double Face]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Downward Pressure]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Duration]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Duration Gap]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Financial Institutions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Gap]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Interest Rate Risk]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liabilities]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Market Interest Rates]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mismatch]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Money Supply]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pension Funds]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You deposit money in a bank right? Do you happen to know the duration gap of the bank assets and liabilities. Is it positive? How positive is it? Will an increase in interest rates wipe out their asset base? What is the overall duration gap of the asset-liabilities held by US banks? If it is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You deposit money in a bank right? Do you happen to know the duration gap of the bank assets and liabilities. Is it positive? How positive is it? Will an increase in interest rates wipe out their asset base? What is the overall duration gap of the asset-liabilities held by US banks? If it is true that defaults reduce M3 and M3 is in fact declining will interest rates go up as money becomes scarcer? Did you know that we are starting to see less appetite for the 30 year T bond. Seems like investors are ever so gradually shying away from it because they do not want to get trapped in a long position if interest rates go up. In other words the money is starting to think interest rates will go up. </p>
<p>I have read that the duration gap of most of the bank’s holdings are strongly positive meaning that if interest rates ever go up they stand to lose a lot of money as their assetts lose a tremendous amount of value because of the assett liability mismatch caused by their huge overleveraged derivatives holdings. If the destruction of credit money continues putting downward pressure on the M3 money supply interest rates will have to go up. Below I have copied and pasted information from Wikipedia regarding what the duration gap is and what it means.</p>
<p>The duration gap is a financial and accounting term and is typically used by banks, pension funds, or other financial institutions to measure their risk due to changes in the interest rate. This is one of the mismatches that can occur and are known as asset liability mismatches.Another way to define Duration Gap is : it is the difference in the sensitivity of interest-yielding assets and the sensitivity of liabilities (of the organization ) to a change in market interest rates (yields).The duration gap measures how well matched are the timings of cash inflows (from assets) and cash outflows (from liabilities).When the duration of assets is larger than the duration of liabilities, the duration gap is positive. In this situation, if interest rates rise, more assets than liabilities will lose value, thus reducing the value of the firm&#8217;s equity. If interest rates fall, more assets than liabilities will gain value, thus increasing the value of the firm&#8217;s equity.Conversely, when the duration of assets is less than the duration of liabilities, the duration gap is negative. If interest rates rise, more liabilities than assets will lose value, thus increasing the value of the firm&#8217;s equity. If interest rates fall, more liabilities than assets will gain value, thus reducing the value of the firm&#8217;s equity.By duration matching, that is creating a zero duration gap, the firm becomes immunized against interest rate risk. Duration has a double-facet view. It can be beneficial or harmful depending on where interest rates are headed.</p>
<p>Some of the limitations of duration gap management include the following:</p>
<p>- the difficulty in finding assets and liabilities of the same duration<br />
- some assets and liabilities may have patterns of cash flows that are not well defined<br />
- customer prepayments may distort the expected cash flows in duration<br />
- customer defaults may distort the expected cash flows in duration<br />
- convexity can cause problems.</p>
<p>When the duration gap is zero, the firm is immunized only if the size of the liabilities equals the size of the assets. In this example with a two-year loan of one million and a one-year asset of two millions, the firm is still exposed to refinancing risk after one year when the remaining year of the two-year loan has to be financed.</p>
<p>To be able to compare firms and banks of different size the equation has to be normalized by dividing everything by total assets giving the formula for the duration gap. </p>
<p>- dbdmmb  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/duration-gap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This just blows my mind! The table below is a list of the total derivative holdings of the top 25 holding companies as reported by the OCC (in $TRILLIONS).</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/this-just-blows-my-mind-the-table-below-is-a-list-of-the-total-derivative-holdings-of-the-top-25-holding-companies-as-reported-by-the-occ-in-trillions/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/this-just-blows-my-mind-the-table-below-is-a-list-of-the-total-derivative-holdings-of-the-top-25-holding-companies-as-reported-by-the-occ-in-trillions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Assets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Banking Operations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Banking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Depositors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Derivatives]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Greed]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Holding Company]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Insanity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jp Morgan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Occ]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pigs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Scary]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Trillion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Trillions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1990……..7.0
1991……..7.1
1992……..9.7
1993……..12.0
1994……..15.8
1995……..17.6
1996……..19.8
1997……..25.0
1998……..32.5
1999……..39.3
2000……..41.2
2001……..47.7
2002……..55.9
2003……..70.0
2004……..86.3
2005……..103.1
2006……..132.4
2007……..179.7
2008……..184.7
2009……..293.3
Far and away the largest increase was between the third quarter of 2008 and the third quarter of 2009. The pigs haven’t learned a thing. Back to business as usual? Nope! They’re getting more aggressive.
The largest holder is JP Morgan with $79.397 TRILLION in derivatives. They have $2.041 Trillion in assets giving them an asset [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1990……..7.0<br />
1991……..7.1<br />
1992……..9.7<br />
1993……..12.0<br />
1994……..15.8<br />
1995……..17.6<br />
1996……..19.8<br />
1997……..25.0<br />
1998……..32.5<br />
1999……..39.3<br />
2000……..41.2<br />
2001……..47.7<br />
2002……..55.9<br />
2003……..70.0<br />
2004……..86.3<br />
2005……..103.1<br />
2006……..132.4<br />
2007……..179.7<br />
2008……..184.7<br />
2009……..293.3</p>
<p>Far and away the largest increase was between the third quarter of 2008 and the third quarter of 2009. The pigs haven’t learned a thing. Back to business as usual? Nope! They’re getting more aggressive.</p>
<p>The largest holder is JP Morgan with $79.397 TRILLION in derivatives. They have $2.041 Trillion in assets giving them an asset to derivatives ratio of 2.6%. The holding company with the lowest ratio of assets to derivative is Goldman Sachs at just 1.8% ($882 BILLION in assets against $49.803 TRILLION in derivatives).</p>
<p>The above data relates to the “holding companies”. But when looking at the “commercial banking operations”, it’s even worse. JP Morgan has an asset to derivates ratio of 2.1% in their commercial banking operation, which accounts for the bulk of their holding company’s operations ($1.67 TRILLION in assets against $79.0 TRILLION in derivatives).</p>
<p>The scary thing……..the commercial bank with the lowest assets to derivatives ratio……GOLDMAN SACHS. Goldman’s commercial bank has $114 BILLION in assets and $41.971 TRILLION in derivatives………..an asset to derivatives ratio of just 0.3%. That is not a misprint. ASSETS TO DERIVATIVES RATIO of 0.3%. It wouldn’t take a huge adverse move to wipe out depositors.</p>
<p>THE INSANITY…THE GREED….CONTINUES. </p>
<p> - Vics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/this-just-blows-my-mind-the-table-below-is-a-list-of-the-total-derivative-holdings-of-the-top-25-holding-companies-as-reported-by-the-occ-in-trillions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>News from the UK 03/11/2010. Banks are preparing for a double dip recession.</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/news-from-the-uk-03112010-banks-are-preparing-for-a-double-dip-recession/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/news-from-the-uk-03112010-banks-are-preparing-for-a-double-dip-recession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Capital Ratio]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Crash]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Double Dip Recession]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Downturn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Economic Growth]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Financial Services Authority]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fsa]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[House Prices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nasty Surprises]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nightmare Scenario]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ris]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Scenarios]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Stress Test]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Stress Tests]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Target]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Test Targets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Trough]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uk Banks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment Rate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Watchdog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Whole Lot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UK banks have been ordered by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) to prepare for a double dip recession, another crash in house prices and a sharp increase in unemployment.
The 2010 stress test targets set by the regulator are even more stringent than last year and draw up a nightmare scenario which may require banks to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UK banks have been ordered by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) to prepare for a double dip recession, another crash in house prices and a sharp increase in unemployment.</p>
<p>The 2010 stress test targets set by the regulator are even more stringent than last year and draw up a nightmare scenario which may require banks to have a higher capital ratio than the current 4%.</p>
<p>The City watchdog says these new scenarios represents &#8220;severe but plausible macroeconomic stress&#8221; but they have come in for heavy criticism from institutions already short of capital.</p>
<p>Banks must assume that in 2010 to 2014 economic growth will tumble 8.1% from peak to trough, up from the 6.9% target set last year - which was close to the 6.2% that materialised.</p>
<p>They must also envisage that the unemployment rate will rise to 13.3% from 7.8% at present.</p>
<p>But their models for house prices must only take into account a 36% fall from their peaks in August 2008, an improvement on the 50% set by the FSA last year.</p>
<p>Lord Turner of Ecchinswell, the chairman of the FSA said he expects the UK to see a gradual V-shaped recovery but the tests are a crucial part of making sure banks are strong enough to survive a further downturn in the economy.</p>
<p>However, he does not expect the tougher targets to lead to a fresh round of capital raisings.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are not anticipating that [meeting the new requirements] requires a whole lot of extra capital,&#8217; he says. &#8216;A lot of the banks will have a stronger starting point than they did when running the 2009 stress tests.&#8221;</p>
<p>Lord Turner has warned that the economy remains at risk from high levels of debt within the system although there are unlikely to be any &#8216;nasty surprises&#8217; which have not already been factored in.</p>
<p>The UK&#8217;s four largest banks have lost £168 billion since the start of the crisis and have raised £134 billion - of which £66 billion comes from the government.</p>
<p>In their recent full-year results many reported a rise in bad debts during the year although these started to drop back in the second half.</p>
<p>However, Turner added that with the recovery so far fuelled by the stimulus measures rather than fundamentals. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/news-from-the-uk-03112010-banks-are-preparing-for-a-double-dip-recession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer sentiment/spendings up? But consumers aren&#8217;t paying off their credit card debt.</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/consumer-sentimentspendings-up-but-consumers-arent-paying-off-their-credit-card-debt/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/consumer-sentimentspendings-up-but-consumers-arent-paying-off-their-credit-card-debt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Array]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Assumption]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ceo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Credit Research]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Loans]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Sentiment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Credit Card Debt]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Credit Card Loans]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Credit Card Users]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Debt Credit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Downturn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Federal Loans]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve Data]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[First Quarter]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Oh My Goodness]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Personal Wealth]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tease]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Three Months]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Time Consumers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Credit card users not making big dent in debt
Bulk of $93.2 billion drop in card balances due to write-offs
With unemployment high and personal wealth diminished, how was it that strapped consumers were paying down their credit card debt last year? It turns out they probably weren&#8217;t.
The bulk of 2009&#8217;s drop in credit card debt instead [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Credit card users not making big dent in debt<br />
Bulk of $93.2 billion drop in card balances due to write-offs</p>
<p>With unemployment high and personal wealth diminished, how was it that strapped consumers were paying down their credit card debt last year? It turns out they probably weren&#8217;t.</p>
<p>The bulk of 2009&#8217;s drop in credit card debt instead came because banks were forced to write off loans consumers failed to pay, according to an analysis of Federal Reserve data.</p>
<p>Loans are typically charged off by banks once they&#8217;re 180 days past due, under the assumption that the debt won&#8217;t be repaid</p>
<p>In 2009, banks wrote off a record $83.27 billion in credit card debt. A study by consumer credit research site CardHub.com found that accounts for the bulk of the of $93.2 billion drop in consumer card balances reported by the Fed for last year.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you just look at the numbers, you think, &#8216;Oh my goodness, there was a big decrease in credit card debt,&#8217;&#8221; said Odysseas Papadimitriou, CEO and founder of CardHub.com.</p>
<p>But Papadimitriou said it didn&#8217;t add up that consumers could make such a big dent in debt while under the financial pressure Americans faced last year.</p>
<p>The Federal Reserve&#8217;s reports on outstanding consumer loans don&#8217;t tease out the amount charged off by banks. By that measure, credit card borrowing fell for 16 straight months through January, suggesting consumers have been chipping away at balances and spending less.</p>
<p>When you consider how much banks are being forced to forsake in bad loans, however, consumers&#8217; ability to pay off balances doesn&#8217;t appear as rosy.</p>
<p>The only time consumers truly paid down their debt was in the first quarter of last year, the CardHub.com study finds. During those three months, card balances fell by $46.9 billion, excluding the $17.59 billion banks wrote off.</p>
<p>After that, card balances either remained steady or rose.</p>
<p>The charge-off rate on credit card loans spiked dramatically in the downturn, hitting a record 10.1 percent in the third quarter of 2009.</p>
<p>The rate eased to 9.4 percent for the year&#8217;s final three months. By comparison, the rate was 4 percent in the fourth quarter of 2006, a year before the downturn began.</p>
<p>The situation may only get worse for banks. Moody&#8217;s Investor Service expects the charge-off rate to top out at 12 percent later this year. Charge-off rates vary depending on the bank, however.</p>
<p>At Bank of America, the annual net charge-off rate for U.S. cards declined to 13.2 percent in January from 13.5 percent in December, while Capital One said its rate rose to 10.41 percent in January from 10.14 percent in December.</p>
<p>Gail Cunningham, of the National Foundation for Credit Counseling, said she&#8217;s not surprised if consumers are still leaning on credit cards, especially given the high unemployment rate.</p>
<p>Still, she said she&#8217;s noticing significant belt tightening.</p>
<p>&#8220;People have made a conscious decision to rein in their spending,&#8221; Cunningham said.</p>
<p>- NK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/consumer-sentimentspendings-up-but-consumers-arent-paying-off-their-credit-card-debt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politics, shaky economy create no rush to restructure Fannie and Freddie</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/politics-shaky-economy-create-no-rush-to-restructure-fannie-and-freddie/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/politics-shaky-economy-create-no-rush-to-restructure-fannie-and-freddie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Collapse]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Emergency Efforts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Financial Markets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Half Year]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Home Loans]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Housing Market]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lawmakers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Members Of Congress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Preliminary Report]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Public Commitment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sixteen Months]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Secretary]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U S Home]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
(Maybe Government Have No Idea How Want to Restructure Fannie and Freddie)
The federal government has spent the past half year seeking to roll back its emergency efforts at propping up the financial markets &#8212; with the notable exception of its involvement in mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
As the government has pledged more and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://www.cagle.com/working/080726/keefe.jpg" class="alignright" width="400" height="275" /></p>
<p>(Maybe Government Have No Idea How Want to Restructure Fannie and Freddie)</p>
<p>The federal government has spent the past half year seeking to roll back its emergency efforts at propping up the financial markets &#8212; with the notable exception of its involvement in mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.</p>
<p>As the government has pledged more and more money to cover the companies&#8217; losses, it has assured the public that planning was underway for overhauling the firms so the bailouts would end. As recently as December, the Obama administration said it expected to release a preliminary report on how to remake Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac around Feb. 1.</p>
<p>But no plan was produced, and in response to questions from lawmakers, Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner clarified last month that it would be another year before the government proposes how to restructure the firms.</p>
<p>Sixteen months after they were seized to prevent their collapse, the companies remain wards of the state, running a tab that has now exceeded $125 billion in what has become the single costliest component of the federal bailout for the financial system.</p>
<p>Some members of Congress have complained that the huge public commitment is unsustainable. But the administration has been reluctant to start reforming Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, officials and analysts say, because the firms in their current form play an essential role in supporting the housing market at a time when it is still under severe stress. As other financial firms have exited the market and credit has seized up, Fannie and Freddie have been behind the vast majority of mortgages made since the start of the financial crisis. The companies now own or back more than half of all U.S. home loans.</p>
<p>- NK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/politics-shaky-economy-create-no-rush-to-restructure-fannie-and-freddie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Coming Asian Storm: Australian jobless rate suprisely up, Japan&#8217;s GDP revised down, and China&#8217;s CPI rise more than expected.</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/the-coming-asian-storm-australian-jobless-suprisely-up-japans-gdp-revised-down-and-chinas-cpi-rise-more-than-expected/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/the-coming-asian-storm-australian-jobless-suprisely-up-japans-gdp-revised-down-and-chinas-cpi-rise-more-than-expected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Asian Storm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Australian Employers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bureau Of Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cabinet Office]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Chief Cabinet Secretary]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Price Index]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones Newswires]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Downward Revision]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Food Prices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hirano]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hirofumi]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Initial Reading]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Median Estimate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[National Bureau Of Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nikkei Dow]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Quarter Growth]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Story Markets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo Search Results]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
March 11 (Bloomberg) &#8212; Australian employers added the fewest jobs  in six months in February, suggesting the central bank has room to slow the pace of future interest-rate increases.
The number of people employed rose 400 from January after jumping a revised 56,500 in the previous month. That was less than the median estimate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img alt="" src="http://www.richard-seaman.com/Travel/Brunei/Storm.jpg" class="aligncenter" width="490" height="351" /></p>
<p>March 11 (Bloomberg) &#8212; Australian employers added the fewest jobs  in six months in February, suggesting the central bank has room to slow the pace of future interest-rate increases.</p>
<p>The number of people employed rose 400 from January after jumping a revised 56,500 in the previous month. That was less than the median estimate of a 15,000 gain in a Bloomberg News survey of 25 economists. The jobless rate increased to 5.3 percent from a revised 5.2 percent. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601080&#038;sid=aVigjLBs15uM">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601080&#038;sid=aVigjLBs15uM</a></p>
<p> TOKYO (Nikkei/Dow Jones)&#8211;The Japanese government&#8217;s top spokesman said Thursday that a downward revision in the country&#8217;s fourth-quarter growth rate shows that domestic economic conditions remain severe.</p>
<p>&#8220;Even though the growth rate is still positive, (the downward revision) shows that we still need to watch economic conditions closely,&#8221; Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirofumi Hirano told a regular press conference.</p>
<p>Earlier in the day, the Cabinet Office said Japan&#8217;s gross domestic product expanded at a price-adjusted annual pace of 3.8% during the October-December period, compared with an initial reading in February of a 4.6% increase. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/japan-hirano-revised-gdp-shows-economic-conditions-severe/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxbusiness%2Flatest+%28Text+-+Latest+News%29&#038;utm_content=Yahoo+Search+Results">http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/japan-hirano-revised-gdp-shows-economic-conditions-severe/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxbusiness%2Flatest+%28Text+-+Latest+News%29&#038;utm_content=Yahoo+Search+Results</a></p>
<p>HONG KONG (MarketWatch) &#8212; China&#8217;s consumer price index accelerated to a pace of 2.7% in February from the year-earlier month, driven by a surge in food prices, according to official data released Thursday.</p>
<p>The increase, as reported by the National Bureau of Statistics, was higher than the 2.4% rise estimated by analysts in a Dow Jones Newswires survey, and was above the 1.5% increase in January&#8217;s CPI. </p>
<p>Food prices jumped 6.2% during the month, driving the price index higher.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/chinas-consumer-prices-rise-more-than-expected-2010-03-10-222900">http://www.marketwatch.com/story/chinas-consumer-prices-rise-more-than-expected-2010-03-10-222900</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/the-coming-asian-storm-australian-jobless-suprisely-up-japans-gdp-revised-down-and-chinas-cpi-rise-more-than-expected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sen. Joan Bray on budget: “We’re in a very deep hole”</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/sen-joan-bray-on-budget-%e2%80%9cwe%e2%80%99re-in-a-very-deep-hole%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/sen-joan-bray-on-budget-%e2%80%9cwe%e2%80%99re-in-a-very-deep-hole%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conference Call]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[D University]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Deep Hole]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dire Need]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Education Conference]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Education Representatives]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Federal Money]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Joan Bray]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Joan Bray and two education representatives held a conference call with reporters today to underscore the state’s dire need for more federal stimulus money. “The economy in Missouri is not improving at this point, and we’re looking not just months out but years out for it to come around,” said Bray, D-University City. “We [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Joan Bray and two education representatives held a conference call with reporters today to underscore the state’s dire need for more federal stimulus money. “The economy in Missouri is not improving at this point, and we’re looking not just months out but years out for it to come around,” said Bray, D-University City. “We are in a very deep hole at this point.”</p>
<p>Read more <a href="http://interact.stltoday.com/blogzone/political-fix/political-fix/2010/03/sen-joan-bray-on-budget-were-in-a-very-deep-hole/">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/sen-joan-bray-on-budget-%e2%80%9cwe%e2%80%99re-in-a-very-deep-hole%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China used billions to stimulate the economy and U.S did it to increase banker&#8217;s bonuses.</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/china-used-billions-to-stimulate-the-economy-and-us-did-it-to-increase-bankers-bonuses/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/china-used-billions-to-stimulate-the-economy-and-us-did-it-to-increase-bankers-bonuses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Billions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[China Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Price Index]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Bond Markets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cpi]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones Newswires]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Food Prices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Government Support]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Industry Profits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Marketwatch]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New York State]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New York State Comptroller]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pace]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Producer Price Index]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Three Times]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Time Record]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Bonuses]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[York State Comptroller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
China&#8217;s consumer prices rise more than expected
HONG KONG (MarketWatch) &#8212; China&#8217;s consumer price index accelerated to a pace of 2.7% in February from the year-earlier month, driven by a surge in food prices, according to official data released Thursday. The increase was higher than the 2.4% rise estimated by analysts in a Dow Jones Newswires [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://posterous.com/getfile/files.posterous.com/bigpicture/iuq3YXL3ZC3vmDQLN3UKiryYFRZSc0uCM6L5UwUZEp0C3e84SX7Fh4ZRu574/Wall_Street_Bonus.gif" class="alignright" width="400" height="400" /></p>
<p>China&#8217;s consumer prices rise more than expected</p>
<p>HONG KONG (MarketWatch) &#8212; China&#8217;s consumer price index accelerated to a pace of 2.7% in February from the year-earlier month, driven by a surge in food prices, according to official data released Thursday. The increase was higher than the 2.4% rise estimated by analysts in a Dow Jones Newswires survey, and was above the 1.5% increase in January&#8217;s CPI. Food prices jumped 6.2% during the month, driving the price index higher. February&#8217;s producer price index accelerated 5.4% from the year-earlier period, also beating forecasts of a 5% increase.</p>
<p>Wall St. bonuses climbed 17% to $20.3 billion in 2009</p>
<p>SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) &#8212; Wall Street bonuses climbed 17% to $20.3 billion last year as stock and corporate bond markets rebounded strongly amid unprecedented government support, according to an estimate released Tuesday by New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli.</p>
<p>Total compensation at the largest securities firms grew even faster and industry profits could exceed an unprecedented $55 billion in 2009, nearly three times greater than the previous all-time record, DiNapoli added in a statement. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/china-used-billions-to-stimulate-the-economy-and-us-did-it-to-increase-bankers-bonuses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mortgage Insurers Won&#8217;t Pay on Bad Loans</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/mortgage-insurers-wont-pay-on-bad-loans/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/mortgage-insurers-wont-pay-on-bad-loans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bad Loans]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Buy Insurance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cnbc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Housing Market]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Insurer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Landscape]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Loans Mortgage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Insurance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Insurers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Market]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Rates]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Quarters]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Rescission]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Resi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ &#8220;[Mortgage insurers] claim rescission  rates have shot up from a historic rate of around 7 percent to as much  as 25 percent over the last few quarters.&#8221; &#8212; Moody&#8217;s Resi Landscape







AP




When I saw that, I thought, well here is the mortgage insurance  industry, faced with an historic number of claims, trying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span id="byLine"> </span><em>&#8220;[Mortgage insurers] claim rescission  rates have shot up from a historic rate of around 7 percent to as much  as 25 percent over the last few quarters.&#8221; &#8212; Moody&#8217;s Resi Landscape</em></p>
<p><a name="StoryImage"></a></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="1%" align="left">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://media.cnbc.com/i/CNBC/Sections/News_And_Analysis/__Story_Inserts/graphics/__REAL_ESTATE/home_sales3.jpg" border="0" alt="" hspace="0" width="200" height="150" align="left" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AP<br />
<hr size="1" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>When I saw that, I thought, well here is the mortgage insurance  industry, faced with an historic number of claims, trying to save itself  at the cost of the big banks.</p>
<p>I mean, if you buy insurance for a product, and something bad happens  to that product, then you should make a claim and get paid back by the  insurer.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the definition of insurance.</p>
<p><strong></strong><strong>But just like everything else in today&#8217;s  housing/mortgage market, nothing is as it should be.</strong></p>
<p>Mortgage insurers are rescinding (denying) claims, claiming  themselves that the loans were fraudulent and misrepresented to them.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/35800892">http://www.cnbc.com/id/35800892</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/mortgage-insurers-wont-pay-on-bad-loans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate change is a fact, says China</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/climate-change-is-a-fact-says-china/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/climate-change-is-a-fact-says-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Abc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Advocate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Burning Fossil Fuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[China Food]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[China People]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Chinese People]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate China]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Countries]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Deputy Director]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Economic Stability]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Food Security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News Stories]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ordinary People]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reliance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Scientists]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Term Observation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Www Abc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/03/11/2842415.htm?section=justin
The Chinese Government says the view that climate change is not man-made is a marginal and &#8220;extreme&#8221; outlook.
According to Xie Zhenhua, a deputy director at China&#8217;s powerful National Development and Reform Commission, climate change is a fact based on long-term observation in many countries.
At the annual session of China&#8217;s National People&#8217;s Congress, he said that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/03/11/2842415.htm?section=justin">http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/03/11/2842415.htm?section=justin</a></p>
<p>The Chinese Government says the view that climate change is not man-made is a marginal and &#8220;extreme&#8221; outlook.</p>
<p>According to Xie Zhenhua, a deputy director at China&#8217;s powerful National Development and Reform Commission, climate change is a fact based on long-term observation in many countries.</p>
<p>At the annual session of China&#8217;s National People&#8217;s Congress, he said that those who advocate that climate change is not man-made are holding an extreme and marginal view.</p>
<p>He said that the majority of the world&#8217;s scientists believed that climate change has been caused by burning fossil fuels.</p>
<p>He and other officials said that more work needed to be done to ensure that scientific data on climate change was watertight, but the world had no choice but to reduce its reliance on fossil fuels.</p>
<p>Mr Xie said climate change is not only something that ordinary Chinese people can feel and experience every day, but that it may soon have a huge impact on China&#8217;s food security and even its economic stability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/climate-change-is-a-fact-says-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Danger: Here&#8217;s some REAL returns for you - the historical Treasury Statement numbers year to date and current month</title>
		<link>http://investmentwatchblog.com/danger-heres-some-real-returns-for-you-the-historical-treasury-statement-numbers-year-to-date-and-current-month/</link>
		<comments>http://investmentwatchblog.com/danger-heres-some-real-returns-for-you-the-historical-treasury-statement-numbers-year-to-date-and-current-month/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Market Outlook]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[163]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[A6]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Afgan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Control]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Control Congress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fms]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fy 2000]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Government Site]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Outlays]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pdf]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Receipts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Statement Numbers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tarp]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Treas Gov]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Statement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Year To Date]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ytd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investmentwatchblog.com/?p=20377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[please note that the DEFICIT is now at 81% of the total receipts - in other words we are spending at a rate of 181% of what we take in!
Here is look at the information from the government site -
http://fms.treas.gov/mts/mts0210.pdf
YTD …. Receipts …. Outlays …. Def+/Sur-
FY 1981 …. 216,278 …. 271,883 …. 55,605
FY 1982 …. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please note that the DEFICIT is now at 81% of the total receipts - in other words we are spending at a rate of 181% of what we take in!</p>
<p>Here is look at the information from the government site -</p>
<p><a href="http://fms.treas.gov/mts/mts0210.pdf">http://fms.treas.gov/mts/mts0210.pdf</a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">YTD …. Receipts …. Outlays …. Def+/Sur-<br />
FY 1981 …. 216,278 …. 271,883 …. 55,605<br />
FY 1982 …. 245,502 …. 299,159 …. 53,656<br />
FY 1983 …. 233,365 …. 336,549 …. 103,183<br />
FY 1984 …. 259,826 …. 349,044 …. 89,217<br />
FY 1985 …. 290,652 …. 391,168 …. 100,518<br />
FY 1986 …. 307,316 …. 413,516 …. 106,201<br />
FY 1987 …. 327,248 …. 422,530 …. 95,282<br />
FY 1988 …. 346,698 …. 437,063 …. 90,364<br />
FY 1989 …. 372,770 …. 466,781 …. 94,009<br />
FY 1990 …. 393,381 …. 490,892 …. 97,513<br />
FY 1991 …. 417,763 …. 528,777 …. 111,015<br />
FY 1992 …. 421,574 …. 570,234 …. 148,660<br />
FY 1993 …. 443,839 …. 582,984 …. 139,146<br />
FY 1994 …. 483,314 …. 601,141 …. 117,826<br />
FY 1995 …. 522,154 …. 618,481 …. 96,327<br />
FY 1996 …. 556,453 …. 637,272 …. 80,817<br />
FY 1997 …. 587,005 …. 676,845 …. 89,839<br />
FY 1998 …. 646,939 …. 702,607 …. 55,669<br />
FY 1999 …. 683,734 …. 711,254 …. 27,520<br />
FY 2000 …. 741,759 …. 742,561 …. 803<br />
FY 2001 …. 790,962 …. 765,095 …. -25,866<br />
FY 2002 …. 767,724 …. 837,139 …. 69,415 9/11 and recession<br />
FY 2003 …. 705,163 …. 899,100 …. 193,937 Iraq/Afgan and recession<br />
FY 2004 …. 710,341 …. 937,111 …. 226,771<br />
FY 2005 …. 790,284 …. 1,014,170 …. 223,886<br />
FY 2006 …. 873,074 …. 1,090,594 …. 217,521<br />
FY 2007 …. 954,449 …. 1,116,605 …. 162,159<br />
FY 2008 …. 967,152 …. 1,230,412 …. 263,258 Democrats control CONgress<br />
FY 2009 …. 860,786 …. 1,450,589 …. 589,803 Democrats control everything, TARP<br />
FY 2010 …. 800,538 …. 1,452,139 …. 651,601 Democrats control everything</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Change % From &#8216;09 -7.00% …. 0.11% …. 10.48%<br />
Change % From &#8216;08 -17.23% …. 18.02% …. 147.51%</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">February data<br />
Year …. Receipts …. Outlays …. Deficit …. Deficit % of Receipts<br />
Feb 01 …. 110,481 …. 158,649 …. 48,168 …. 43.6%<br />
Feb 02 …. 97,962 …. 174,018 …. 76,056 …. 77.6%<br />
Feb 03 …. 89,496 …. 185,826 …. 96,330 …. 107.6%<br />
Feb 04 …. 85,314 …. 182,022 …. 96,709 …. 113.4%<br />
Feb 05 …. 100,871 …. 214,814 …. 113,942 …. 113.0%<br />
Feb 06 …. 112,853 …. 232,052 …. 119,199 …. 105.6%<br />
Feb 07 …. 120,312 …. 240,305 …. 119,993 …. 99.7%<br />
Feb 08 …. 105,723 …. 281,287 …. 175,563 …. 166.1%<br />
Feb 09 …. 87,312 …. 281,171 …. 193,859 …. 222.0%<br />
Feb 10 …. 107,521 …. 328,429 …. 220,908 …. 205.5%</p>
<p>All you need to know is according to Treasury Statement of Receipts and Outlays</p>
<p>Receipts for Jan 2010 = 205,240 Million<br />
Outlays for Jan 2010 = 247,874 Million<br />
Receipts for Feb 2010 = 107,521 Million<br />
Outlays for Fed 2010 = 328,429 Million</p>
<p>We are sinking further and further into DEBT</p>
<p>By the way, do not be lulled by the fact that this month is actually higher than last year at this time - look at the YTD. Probably just a payment shift structure. And our spending is greater by a SIGNIFICANT amount!</p>
<p>- irishscot2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://investmentwatchblog.com/danger-heres-some-real-returns-for-you-the-historical-treasury-statement-numbers-year-to-date-and-current-month/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
