We're always following the world's economic trends and searching for the market-moving insight that everyone else has missed
John Roberts twisted the law in knots to find a way to justify this ruling. He called Obamacare a tax even though it was argued in the case by the Obama lawyers that it wasnt a tax. One theory states that they did that because if it was a tax, and it was a law started in the Senate it would automatically be unconstitutional. Tax legislation must be started in the House of Representatives. In any case, the ruling made zero sense. If he just believed Obamacare was Constitutional he could have just fell in line with the liberals on the SCOTUS, but to take this absurd path to a contortion of a ruling cannot be explained.
Copyright © 2014 InvestmentWatch - All Rights ReservedPowered by WordPress & the Atahualpa Theme by BytesForAll. Discuss on our WP Forum