How Adolf Hitler Prevented ‘Subject Races’ From Possessing Arms. Obama’s Military Purge

During a speech in 1942, Adolf Hitler said, “The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to posses arms.” In other words, Jews and others whom Hitler wanted to wipe from the earth first had to be separated from their guns.

This was not new position for Hitler. Rather, it was something he had put into practice from the moment he came into office.

When Adolf Hitler came to power in 1933, he seized gun registration information that had been compiled by Germany’s previous government under the premise that the information would not fall into the wrong hands or be used for an all-out confiscation scheme. But as gun scholar Stephen P. Halbrook makes clear in his new book, Gun Control in the Third Reich: Disarming the Jews and “Enemies of the State,” Hitler’s hands were the wrong hands. And Hitler and the Nazi movement used all the information they could find—as well as the threat of brute force and death—to force Jews and others to hand over their firearms.

As Halbrook put it: “The Nazis thought it was pretty important to be sure the Jews weren’t armed.”

Gun Control in the Third Reich covers gun control under Hitler but, perhaps more importantly, it covers the methodology of that gun control in great detail. In so doing, Halbrook helps the reader sees how registration led to confiscation, and how confiscation turned citizens into subjects and eventually into victims—victims of their own government and/or of an invading force.

Halbrook also shows how propaganda was used to further gun control and how terms like “assault rifle” did not exist until Hitler created them.

Obama’s Military Purge

This year alone, nine senior commanding generals have been fired by the administration, and retired generals and current commanders who have spoken to TheBlaze believe that political ideology is the primary impetus behind the effort. “I think they’re using the opportunity of the shrinkage of the military to get rid of people that don’t agree with them or not toe the party line,” a senior retired general told website. ”Remember, as Rahm Emanuel said, never waste a crisis.” The general spoke on the condition of anonymity because he still provides the government with services and believes this administration would retaliate against him.

The terminations have a distinctly political odor surrounding them in at least three cases. In all three of these cases, Benghazi is at root. U.S. Army Gen. Carter Ham was heading the United States African Command when our consulate came under attack on September 11, 2012. Ham told Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) he was never given a “stand down” order preventing him from securing the consulate. Yet the Washington Times, citing sources in the military, said he was given the order and immediately relieved of command when he decided to defy it. The Times further noted that Ham “retired” less that two years after receiving the command when all other commanders of similar stature have stayed on far longer. Sources told TheBlaze Ham was highly critical of the Obama administration’s decision not to send reinforcements to Benghazi.



Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS
  • anon

    First of all, it is absurd to declare that Hitler wanted to wipe all unwanted races from the earth. Second, the Bolshevik Zionists were continually attempting to overthrow German governments, even before Hitler came to power. Then in 1933 they declared an economic boycott against Germany – an act of war. Perhaps that is why Hitler wanted to prevent his enemies from getting another chance.

    • Helpfulhippy

      “They” actually referred to it as a declaration of war in most of the media at the time. I’m getting a little tired of the same bunch vilifying the German people every chance they can. It’s as if the Zionists don’t want the other side of the story told, ever.

      • Drdetroitdanchap

        It is UNFAIR and WRONG to compare Israel to the Nazis.
        The CORRECT comparison is Nazis to Israelis:
        ‘In the cities of the nations the Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance, do not leave alive anything that breathes’–Deuteronomy 20:16-18
        Israel EXONERATES the Nazis
        The Nazis copied the Jewish “Manual” point by point
        Numbers c.5 v.2-4
        Leviticus c.20 v.13 well, really the whole chapter
        Exodus c.32 v.27
        Numbers c.11 v.1-2
        Numbers c.16 all
        Numbers c.21 v.5-6
        Numbers v.26 v.10
        KILL anyone who engages in “DIVERSITY” or “INTEGRATION”
        Numbers v25 v.4-8
        Deuteronomy c.14 v.2
        Numbers c.21 v.03 Canaanites
        Numbers c.21 v.24 Amorites
        Numbers c.21 v.33-35 Bashan
        Numbers c.31 all Midianites
        Numbers c.32 v. more Amorites
        Deuteronomy c.2 v.34 People of Heshbon
        Deuteronomy c.3 v.6 really the whole chapter. threescore cities
        Joshua c.12 A list of victims of Israeli GENOCIDE
        Where are THEIR “holocaust” Memorials!
        Numbers c.21 v.25
        Numbers c.32 v.39
        Numbers c.33 v.53
        (just to name a FEW)
        Numbers c.33 v.31-34
        Deuteronomy c.7 v.2
        Deuteronomy c.12 v.28-30
        Deuteronomy c.20 v.11-16
        Deuteronomy c.2 v.2
        Deuteronomy c.7 v.1
        Jews SELF-anointed “The CHOSEN People of GOD”
        Nazis SELF-anointed “The GENETICALLY CHOSEN People of God”.

  • Drdetroitdanchap

    Time for the Military to remember their DUTY is to the PEOPLE and not to the government.

    Remember how Hitler made the Wehrmacht swear intelligence to HIM when he took over?To place the government before the People is TREASON.

  • Ted Wansley

    Hitler lifted the gun restrictions imposed by his political rivals of the Weiner Republic, even for Jews. He removed the requirement that long guns and ammo be registered, requiring that only concealable firearms be registered.

    Hitler disarmed the Jews before transporting them to camps outside of Germany, just as the US disarmed Japanese before transporting them to camps in the desert.

    Halbrook was writing his book on gun control during the Third Reich while I was producing a documentary as a student with the University of Florida’s Documentary Institute. He offered to share his research with me. I reviewed it and observed a deliberate effort to mislead.

    I was banished from the Documentary Institute after reporting to supervising professors that my research revealed that Hitler had lifted gun ownership restrictions and armed the Germans to the teeth.

    The Allied Forces were the only ones to totally disarm the Germans, taking their swords as well as guns.

    Original German gun laws with English translations are published in “German Gun Control Laws, 1928 – 1945 ” by Dr. Wliam Pierce, PhD. and “Gateway to Tyranny” by Aaron Zelman. Like Halbrook, Zelman tries to mislead his readers, but the laws and translations are accurate.
    Original German gun laws in German and

  • robertsgt40

    As Halbrook put it: “The Nazis thought it was pretty important to be sure the Jews weren’t armed.”—DIDN’T NEED GUNS, THEY HAD FINANCE