If you do nothing else today, watch this analysis of the political contest between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump – and then send it to everyone you know.

Actually, the underlying theme is far more significant than a political campaign. It is the collapse of mainstream media’s control over public opinion caused by the rise of Twitter and social media.  Paul Joseph Watson and Stefan Molyneux are at their peak in this program.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=TS7lk1rURXI

We are primarily funded by readers. Please subscribe and donate to support us!
Views:

10 thoughts on “If you do nothing else today, watch this analysis of the political contest between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump – and then send it to everyone you know.”

  1. THE SAME METHODS HILLARY & CO. ARE USING ON TRUMP WHITE PEOPLE HAVE USED TO CONTROL & ABUSE AFRO-AMERICAN MEN SINCE THEY ARRIVED IN THE U.S. IN 1619.
    ONLY DIFFERENCE IS, THE ‘WASP-JEW NEOCON THUGS ARE EATING ONE OF ITS OWN.

    Reply
      • The first “black” slave sold in America was bought by a free black. Only 1.6% of Southerners owned slaves; the bulk were owned by the North. (Blacks have this “picking cotton” meme they cling to. Man-servants, cooks, maids, and nannies weren’t restricted to the Irish you know.)
        If I have an ancestor who was a Roman slave, does Italy “owe” me a living?
        In Florida, it’s against the law to feed porpoises. Why? Because when they get used to the hand-outs, they become aggressive when they don’t receive same.
        Apparently primates aren’t the only ones! lol

        Reply
  2. Is anyone else censored in their comments and how many? This is the only website that limits my comments to “one”, and the length of it! Color me “curious”…. I’ll stop trying if that’s what it’s about…..

    Reply
    • I haven’t encountered a problem. Engaged in a long back & forth with another guy on 911 – he arguing they came down due to all engulfing fires – me, not so much. Each post was pretty long

      Reply
  3. .
    There is a reason why one man is born black and with other
    disadvantages, while another is born Mormon and white with great
    advantages. The reason is that we once had an estate before we came
    here, and were obedient; more or less, to the laws that were given us
    there. Those who were faithful in all things there [pre-existence]
    received greater blessings here, and those who were not faithful
    received less. . . . There were no neutrals in the war in Heaven. All
    took sides either with Christ or with Satan. Every man had his agency
    there, and men receive rewards here based upon their actions there, just
    as they will receive rewards hereafter for deeds done in the body. The
    Negro, evidently, is receiving the reward he merits (Joseph Fielding
    Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, 1:61, 65-66; emphasis added)…

    Reply
  4. Listen Black man, and I dont bother to repeat my self.
    I have no idea of what have snapped in your community, neither of this “slave” wasn’t confined to just black, this is an flat out lie, an slave is an slave, and why dont we talk about Irish slaves, witch died in millions because of exploitation and simple poverty, no we dont and why dont we do that Black man, because of political agendas and as now, dilution thru fabricating an one sidedness I had to react to.
    I am fad up with that, and what I find even more disturbing is an somehow, an shame, of them self, I dont know what bugs them, an shame of not having huge buildings aka the Pantheon.
    And this days some are trying to rewrite blacks to even be vikings/celts.
    The third, is why are they ashamed, that Black man own believe and knowing is based upon an massive ignorance about African history, why can I tell you about Africans in South America, Africans whom have navigated thru the whole world, but they didnt leave behind insane big building.
    There have been traffic from Africa to Europa for millenniums, for f…. eons.
    And blacks have traveled and lived in Europa since time immemorial.
    What is the f….. issue.
    To me, this historical black hole is what made you an ignorant, along with white people, whom dont even know their own history.
    I measure an society by their level of consciousness and adaption, and My respect to peoples like the South African Pygmies is the same as to my own people, and so on.
    Your world was the Whites Matriarchal, since time immemorial, that changed with the wars against and the plundering of Africa, as the powers to be do to day, that haven’t changed, but to make it to be an white/black issue is forgery of everything and displays just an underlying total lack of knowledge.
    Infact I usually dont comment this issues because of the staggering level of ignorance and lies.
    I dont by the IQ shit, since I belive that tells me nothing, and so on, infact black and whites are mucth more like than different, its just about collor, and race, thats it.
    I dont place anything else into that, period.
    peace

    Reply
  5. Walter Williams: Slavery and the Framers
    What the left won’t tell you
    [..]
    Convention delegate James Wilson offered a compromise whereby each slave would be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purposes of determining the number of representatives a state would have in the House. This rule applied only to slaves. Freemen, whether black or white, would be counted as whole people. Another compromise was to set 1808 as the year to abolish the slave trade.
    Contrary to what academic hustlers teach, the Three-Fifths Compromise was not a statement about human worth; it was an attempt to reduce the pro-slavery representation in Congress. By including only three-fifths of the total number of slaves in congressional calculations, Southern states were actually being denied a greater number of representatives in Congress and hence electoral votes for selecting a president.
    [..]
    http://www.creators.com/read/walter-williams/04/16/attacking-our-nations-founders
    Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves
    On December 2, 1806, in his annual message to Congress, widely reprinted in most newspapers, President Thomas Jefferson denounced the “violations of human rights” attending the international slave trade and called for its criminalization on the first day that was possible (January 1, 1808). He said:
    I congratulate you, fellow-citizens, on the approach of the period at which you may interpose your authority constitutionally, to withdraw the citizens of the United States from all further participation in those violations of human rights which have been so long continued on the unoffending inhabitants of Africa, and which the morality, the reputation, and the best interests of our country, have long been eager to proscribe.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_Prohibiting_Importation_of_Slaves

    Reply

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.