I think it is advocating that the UK spends itself out of its economical quagmire .
Deficit Terrorists Strike In The UK – USA Next?
By Ellen Brown
Last week, EnglandÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s new government said it would abandon the previous governmentÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s stimulus program and introduce the austerity measures required to pay down its estimated $1 trillion in debts. That means cutting public spending, laying off workers, reducing consumption, and increasing unemployment and bankruptcies. It also means shrinking the money supply, since virtually all Ã¢â‚¬Å“moneyÃ¢â‚¬Â today originates as loans or debt. Reducing the outstanding debt will reduce the amount of money available to pay workers and buy goods, precipitating depression and further economic pain.
July 18, 2010 “Information Clearing House” — The financial sector has sometimes been accused of shrinking the money supply intentionally, in order to increase the demand for its own products. Bankers are in the debt business, and if governments are allowed to create enough money to keep themselves and their constituents out of debt, lenders will be out of business. The central banks charged with maintaining the banking business therefore insist on a Ã¢â‚¬Å“stable currencyÃ¢â‚¬Â at all costs, even if it means slashing services, laying off workers, and soaring debt and interest burdens. For the financial business to continue to boom, governments must not be allowed to create money themselves, either by printing it outright or by borrowing it into existence from their own government-owned banks.
Today this financial goal has largely been achieved. In most countries, 95% or more of the money supply is created by banks as loans (or Ã¢â‚¬Å“creditÃ¢â‚¬Â). The small portion issued by the government is usually created just to replace lost or worn out bills or coins, not to fund new government programs. Early in the twentieth century, about 30% of the British currency was issued by the government as pounds sterling or coins, versus only about 3% today. In the U.S., only coins are now issued by the government. Dollar bills (Federal Reserve Notes) are issued by the Federal Reserve, which is privately owned by a consortium of banks.
Banks advance the principal but not the interest necessary to pay off their loans; and since bank loans are now virtually the only source of new money in the economy, the interest can only come from additional debt. For the banks, that means business continues to boom; while for the rest of the economy, it means cutbacks, belt-tightening and austerity. Since more must always be paid back than was advanced as credit, however, the system is inherently unstable. When the debt bubble becomes too large to be sustained, a recession or depression is precipitated, wiping out a major portion of the debt and allowing the whole process to begin again. This is called the Ã¢â‚¬Å“business cycle,Ã¢â‚¬Â and it causes markets to vacillate wildly, allowing the monied interests that triggered the cycle to pick up real estate and other assets very cheaply on the down-swing.
The financial sector, which controls the money supply and can easily capture the media, cajoles the populace into compliance by selling its agenda as a Ã¢â‚¬Å“balanced budget,Ã¢â‚¬Â Ã¢â‚¬Å“fiscal responsibility,Ã¢â‚¬Â and saving future generations from a massive debt burden by suffering austerity measures now. Bill Mitchell, Professor of Economics at the University of New Castle in Australia, calls this Ã¢â‚¬Å“deficit terrorism.Ã¢â‚¬Â Bank-created debt becomes more important than schools, medical care or infrastructure. Rather than Ã¢â‚¬Å“providing for the general welfare,Ã¢â‚¬Â the purpose of government becomes to maintain the value of the investments of the governmentÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s creditors.