by Pamela Williams
Remember back when the Clinton email investigation was in progress, and the FBI Director James Comey found Clinton not guilty…she had no intent to break the law while using her home server to distribute classified information? Remember how we had to just take it and accept the ruling, when all along we knew it was a lie. We did take it, as we had no choice.
Now we are looking at a much less benign situation with Jeff Sessions having several insignificant meetings with the Russian Ambassador, but it is being blown way out of proportion by the Democrats. They are investigating Sessions, but they never investigated Bill Clinton’s and Loretta Lynch’s meeting. What are we seeing here? Are we Conservatives actually powerless here? We were powerless then, as I look back on it. We knew how wrong that meeting was, but we did nothing…nothing was done. No investigation was done. Wow.
https://twitter.com/kristine_writes/status/837332893588406277
What are we dealing with here? Did we pass through the looking glass yet? Is this just a dream, or is this Conservatives being run over again? We have not even heard of the Clinton investigation yet the is supposedly being done by Jason Chaffetz of the House Oversight Committee. We have heard that Hillary is making a comeback, and she is going to have her own TV show. She is really paying for all her crimes, isn’t she?!
“She’s an honorable person, we know that,” Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said. “She has said nothing was discussed related to the investigation. So you have two choices — to say this didn’t matter or she’s lying. I think it didn’t matter. I don’t think she’s lying.”
Lynch had contended that she and Bill Clinton merely discussed grandchildren, golf and social matters.
During the confirmation process, Sens. Al Franken (D-MN) and Pat Leahy (D-VT) asked what Sessions would do if campaign surrogates had contact with Russians during the 2016 election and if he had contact with the Russians before or after Election Day respectively. Sessions answered no to Leahy’s inquiry. Concerning Franken, Sessions said that he’s been called a surrogate, but he did not have contact with the Russians concerning discussions about the election. Again, he certainly had meetings with foreign diplomats while serving on the Senate Armed Services Committee. These interactions aren’t unusual. What is unusual is an AG–Lynch–meeting with the spouse of a presidential candidate, who is also under federal investigation, and then not fully recusing herself.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=he_dqD9jnZM
Published on Mar 2, 2017
Nancy Pelosi Full Press Conference: Calls for Attorney General Sessions to resign over claims that he lied to Congress about communicating with Russia while he was a Senator and supporting Donald Trump’s campaign. She also says that Sessions talking to Russian ambassador is “completely different from Loretta Lynch’s secret meeting with Bill Clinton”.
How does Nancy Pelosi live with herself? How can we allow as Conservative citizens let these Democrats get away with this???
Jim Stone has some interesting data:
Yep, This is worse than watergate by a long shot. Not to mention THE FOLLOWING JUDGES ARE TOAST!
The exact judges who approved the Trump wiretap by Obama
And yes, the Clintons and corrupt judges were involved.
IMPORTANT: WHEN THESE JUDGES GET FLUSHED, IGNORE THE MSM SPIN, THERE WAS A REASON!
I do not usually post other people’s work, but this is too well done and too important, this HAS TO go viral
Obama could not get a wire tap on Trump legitimately, so he worked behind the scenes with an appeals court in secret. This is an expose’ of the corrupted judges who made it possible to wiretap Trump, and is the source of the leaks. These judges need to HANG. This is FAR WORSE than Watergate.
The following was posted to a popular forum:
“All this info is on the internet…
You have to remember the acting attorney general for Obama pursued this and was turned down by the Fisa court which is a court of differing appointee’s, appointed By Bush, Reagan, Carter, Obama and Bill clinton. So the non partisan committee turned down the request, so it goes to the appeal court which just happened to be all Clinton appointed judges, now we understand why he met with the attorney general on that plane in secret.
Denials of FISA applications by the FISC may be appealed to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review. The Court of Review is a three judge panel. Since its creation, the court has come into session twice: in 2002 and 2008.
Who are these judges who approved the Fisa warrantAppeal on President Trump…
fisc.uscourts.gov
William C. Bryson, (Presiding)
Biographical Directory of Federal Judges
Bryson, William Curtis
Born 1945 in Houston, TX
Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nominated by William J. Clinton on June 22, 1994, to a seat vacated by Howard Thomas Markey. Confirmed by the Senate on September 28, 1994, and received commission on September 29, 1994. Assumed senior status on January 7, 2013.
Judge, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, 2011-present; presiding judge, 2013-present
Education:
Harvard University, A.B., 1969
University of Texas School of Law, J.D., 1973
Professional Career:
Law clerk, Hon. Henry J. Friendly, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 1973-1974
Law clerk, Hon. Thurgood Marshall, Supreme Court of the United States, 1974-1975
Private practice, Washington, D.C., 1975-1978
Assistant to the solicitor general, U.S. Department of Justice, 1978-1979
Chief, Appellate Section, Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 1979-1982
Special counsel, Organized Crime and Racketeering Section, Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 1982-1986
Deputy solicitor general, U.S. Department of Justice, 1986-1994
Deputy associate attorney general (acting associate attorney general), U.S. Department of Justice, 1994
Bryson http://www.fjc.gov
Jose A. Cabranes
Biographical Directory of Federal Judges
Cabranes, Jose Alberto
Born 1940 in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico
Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut
Nominated by Jimmy Carter on November 6, 1979, to a seat vacated by Jon O. Newman. Confirmed by the Senate on December 5, 1979, and received commission on December 10, 1979. Served as chief judge, 1992-1994. Service terminated on August 12, 1994, due to appointment to another judicial position.
Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Nominated by William J. Clinton on May 24, 1994, to a seat vacated by Richard J. Cardamone. Confirmed by the Senate on August 9, 1994, and received commission on August 10, 1994.
Judge, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, 2013-present
Education:
Columbia University, A.B., 1961
Yale Law School, J.D., 1965
University of Cambridge, Queens` College, M.Litt., 1967
Professional Career:
Supervisor in law, Queens’ College, University of Cambridge, England, 1966-1967
Private practice, New York City, 1967-1971
Associate professor of law, Rutgers University School of Law, 1971-1973
Special counsel, Gov. Rafael Hernandez Colon, Puerto Rico, Washington, D.C., 1973-1975
General counsel/director of government relations, Yale University, 1975-1979
Jose http://www.fjc.gov
Tallman, Richard C.
Biographical Directory of Federal Judges
Tallman, Richard C.
Born 1953 in Oakland, CA
Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Nominated by William J. Clinton on October 20, 1999, to a seat vacated by Betty Binns Fletcher. Confirmed by the Senate on May 24, 2000, and received commission on May 25, 2000.
Judge, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, 2014-present
Education:
University of Santa Clara (now Santa Clara University), B.Sc., 1975
Northwestern University School of Law, J.D., 1978
Professional Career:
Law clerk, Hon. Morell E. Sharp, U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington, 1978-1979
Trial attorney, Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 1979-1980
Assistant U.S. attorney, Western District of Washington, 1980-1983
Private practice, Seattle, Washington, 1983-2000
Tallman – http://www.fjc.gov
http://82.221.129.208/baaasepagec4.html
Bingo!
Good stuff Pamela, I feel your anger and frustration that we live in a time of unequal “justice.”
Might add here the FBI met with her at her place with no recording allowed. Much like the Bush/Cheney 9/11 interview.
The great change is in the air, palpable to those who understand. This is going to be a monster year of adjustment in our lives. No time for loners, need to reach out wherever we can to our “family.”
and no neutrals…