>

The Fiscal Cliff Is A Diversion: We’re Going To Be In A New Recession, Washington Lost Total Control On Budget Since 2002, And The Derivatives Tsunami and the Dollar Bubble Are The Real Threats To Our Economy!!


We’re Going to be in a New Recession-John Williams

The banking system is still in trouble.” Williams warns the “open-ended” printing of $85 billion a month “. . . will be part of what will eventually become hyperinflation.” And if there is no deal on the so-called “fiscal cliff,” then Williams expects “heavy selling pressure on the U.S. dollar.”  Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with John Williams of Shadowstats.com.

 

David Walker: “There Is No Party Of Fiscal Responsibility In Washington”

 

 

“When the statutory budget controls expired in 2002, Washington lost total control.  Unfunded tax cuts, unfunded war costs, expansion of entitlement benefits.  And we are where we are today.”

Great interview.

David Walker on Bloomberg yesterday.


 

Click to read more …

 

The Fiscal Cliff Is A Diversion: The Derivatives Tsunami and the Dollar Bubble


Paul Craig Roberts

The “fiscal cliff” is another hoax designed to shift the attention of policymakers, the media, and the attentive public, if any, from huge problems to small ones.

The fiscal cliff is automatic spending cuts and tax increases in order to reduce the deficit by an insignificant amount over ten years if Congress takes no action itself to cut spending and to raise taxes. In other words, the “fiscal cliff” is going to happen either way.

The problem from the standpoint of conventional economics with the fiscal cliff is that it amounts to a double-barrel dose of austerity delivered to a faltering and recessionary economy. Ever since John Maynard Keynes, most economists have understood that austerity is not the answer to recession or depression.

Regardless, the fiscal cliff is about small numbers compared to the Derivatives Tsunami or to bond market and dollar market bubbles.

The fiscal cliff requires that the federal government cut spending by $1.3 trillion over ten years. The Guardian reports that means the federal deficit has to be reduced about $109 billion per year or 3 percent of the current budget. More simply, just divide $1.3 trillion by ten and it comes to $130 billion per year. This can be done by simply taking a three month vacation each year from Washington’s wars.

The Derivatives Tsunami and the bond and dollar bubbles are of a different magnitude.
Last June 5 in “Collapse At Hand” I pointed out that according to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s fourth quarter report for 2011, about 95% of the $230 trillion in US derivative exposure was held by four US financial institutions: JP Morgan Chase Bank, Bank of America, Citibank, and Goldman Sachs.

Prior to financial deregulation, essentially the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act and the non-regulation of derivatives – a joint achievement of the Clinton administration and the Republican Party – Chase, Bank of America, and Citibank were commercial banks that took depositors’ deposits and made loans to businesses and consumers and purchased Treasury bonds with any extra reserves.

With the repeal of Glass-Steagall these honest commercial banks became gambling casinos, like the investment bank, Goldman Sachs, betting not only their own money but also depositors’ money on uncovered bets on interest rates, currency exchange rates, mortgages, and prices of commodities and equities.

These bets soon exceeded many times not only US GDP but world GDP. Indeed, the gambling bets of JP Morgan Chase Bank alone are equal to world Gross Domestic Product.

According to the first quarter 2012 report from the Comptroller of the Currency, total derivative exposure of US banks has fallen insignificantly from the previous quarter to $227 trillion. The exposure of the 4 US banks accounts for almost of all of the exposure and is many multiples of their assets or of their risk capital.

39 Total Views 1 Views Today
Did you already share this? No? Share it now:
  • Tony Rodrigues

    I dont see how there can be hyperinflation because DEBT is money we DO NOT HAVE i.e. it is BORROWED. In our debt based currency model we paper IOUs that cannot be cashed and only monetized because cash is the only legal tender. So in a derivative collapse or debt collapse the question is will the Fed monetize ALL debt? I think not. Much of the debt will be defaulted and perhaps future liabilities will be monetized in part because any attempt to monetize it all will destroy the bond markets which means no ability to borrow in future.