UPDATE: Seth Rich Was Involved In A Lawsuit Against Edison Media Research. He Was In A Difficult Place Before His Death.
by Pamela Williams
Seth Rich was involved in a lawsuit filed against Edison Media Research before he died. He must have been in such a difficult place forced to testify in said lawsuit. I am going to present what I believe to be evidence of this below. Following, I will do commentary on the alleged evidence of the investigation the video from NEWSWEEK was referring to in my first thread “New Information On Seth Rich”.
Sources deeply anonymous have spoken about the truth of this murder. Sources say that Seth Rich was possibly helping Assange, but that he was also the key witness in a case filed against Edison Media Research exposing
the discrepancies between actual voter results and exit polls. Seth was going to expose the DNC’s plans to rig the polls, and he was subsequently executed for it. No source will go on the record but this case holds actual merit. QUOTED FROM:
QUOTED FROM: Here is the actual pdf.document filed in the case:
http://www.mockingbirdpaper.com/sites/default/files/Complaint.pdf
Local activist files suit for access to exit polling data, Dead witness blocks path to truth:
THE ABOVE PHOTO TAKEN FROM:
Local election integrity activist Peter Johnson filed suit in federal court yesterday, July 11, against Edison Media Research Inc. (EMR), a New Jersey company that conducts exit polls that media outlets rely on to report election results. Exit Polls, despite academic efforts to discredit them, are considered to be the “gold standard” for judging the fairness of elections in all countries by both the United Nations and the United States, except when the actual elections are in the United States.
Johnson, represented by local voting rights attorney Robert Fitrakis, alleges that EMR “adjusted” their reporting to match results provided by the office of Ohio Secretary of State John Husted. Because of the close relationship between Husted’s office and EMR, Johnson’s suit is requesting EMR provide their unadjusted results as public records.
Bob Fitrakis (born November 29, 1955) is an American lawyer, political author and writer,[1][2] political candidate, [3] and Professor of Political Science in the Social and Behavioral Sciences Department at Columbus State Community College. He has been the editor of the Columbus Free Press since 1993 and wrote extensively about the U.S. presidential election, 2004 and related 2004 U.S. election voting controversies
The simple seven page complaint is provided at the bottom of this article. It seeks an injunction to provide immediate access to the unadjusted exit polls and the court costs of bringing this action. The relief is sought under First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution so that the public may compare and discuss the actual scientific data collected about the election to the purported results.
The successful prosecution of this suit will provide journalists with a massive trove of data which could be used to substantiate or put the rest the widespread claims of fraud during the 2016 primary process. These claims are based on voter suppression not vote flipping, and the ultimate chain of evidence leads through a recently murdered DNC staffer, to the DNC itself, to the State Department and ultimately Clinton’s IT guru Bryan Pagliano.
While Pagliano, who actually managed Clinton’s illegal private email server, plead the fifth during questioning the FBI. Republicans, possibly rightfully, made scored a point or two on that. What was more interesting was Pagliano’s role in managing the DNC’s voter databases. On his watch the Sanders campaign noted that a breach could occur between his and Clinton’s donor information. While reverse engineering this breach, a staffer was caught. Cross accusations were made and lawsuits filed then withdrawn. If the breach could occur in one direction it could occur in both, and events have proven that at a minimum Pagliano seems to play fast and loose with data and trust.
In order to engage in voter suppression, it is important to be very accurate in knowing which voters to suppress. The best possible way to compile such a list is to vet two or more separate databases against each other. Sanders had one, Clinton had two and the DNC had a third. We may never know the truth about the third because of a recent removal of a key potential witness from this mortal coil.
Sunday Morning July 10 at 4:19, Seth Rich, a key DNC staffer in charge of voter databases was murdered right outside his home in Washington DC. As Fitrakis, Johnson, other election integrity activists and their paralegals were exchanging final emails prior to filing Seth Rich was murdered. There are no witnesses, no suspects, his wallet and cellphone were recovered at the scene and the DC Metro police are “pursuing all possible motives.”
A key potential witness in derivative litigation was shot multiple times in the back 31 hours before this suit was filed. Only a very bad reporter would not be curious. Fitrakis was not aware of Rich’s death until after the filing, as this reporter discovered the suit had been filed while calling him for comment on Rich’s murder. Fitrakis responded with “Wait what? Who? When?”.QUOTED FROM:
Why would the Ohio Green Party Co-Chair end up addressing Bernie Sanders delegates in Philly during the Democratic Party convention? I found myself with them in a pizza place in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania at the behest of the mostly-California-based Election Justice organization.
In a crowded back room, angry and angst-ridden Berners, as they call themselves, listened intently as election protection attorney Bill Simpich outlined what can only be described as a Clinton election coup in the California primary. Simpich has filed three lawsuits in California so far, trying to ensure every vote is counted. Immediately following the primary in California, 2.4 million votes – overwhelmingly from Sanders’ supporters – remained uncounted, resulting from a combination of dirty tricks and illegal voter suppression activities.
When all the votes are counted, Sanders would likely be the victor.
Berners were outraged over the apparent election fraud and the Wikileaks release of 20,000 Democratic National Committee (DNC) emails just prior to the start of Hillary Clinton’s well-orchestrated coronation. They pondered the suspicious death of DNC staffer Seth Rich, found shot twice in the back on July 10 before he was set to testify in the Clinton email investigation. The delegates were particularly pissed about the content of one Wikileaked email from a DNC staffer named “Marshall” to DNC Communication Director Louis Miranda. Marshall wondered about Bernie – “Does he believe in a God.” In another email, staffers plotted to describe Bernie as a “Jew” and “atheist” in hopes of discouraging support for him from West Virginia voters.
In an interview about the revelations in the DNC emails, Sanders had stated, “The Party leadership must always remain impartial in the presidential nominating process, something which did not occur in the 2016 race.”QUOTED FROM:
http://columbusfreepress.com/article/bob-bites-back-fear-and-hacking-democratic-national-convention
by Bob Fitrakis
Now I refer back to the NEWSWEEK VIDEO ON
http://www.newsweek.com/gop-lobbyist-reward-seth-rich-dnc-499653
The video spoke of Seth Rich being a Bernie Sander’s supporter. I believe that Rich was doing everything he could to right the wrongs within the DNC. He was caught in the middle of it all. He began as an idealist working for the DNC, but he ended up murdered. Whether he was murdered because of the above, we probably will never know. However, we must speak the truth that has remained hidden as far as I can see. I believe the above report is true and valid. If Rich had lived he would have had to play an important role in the above lawsuit.