«  
  »

Vaccines: Science VS Superstition

March 19th, 2013




Did you already share this? No? Share it now:
March 19th, 2013 |
  • Jim

    Wow that young girl is so smart she has all the answers. She must be a god or at least think she is one, based solely on her smugness. What will she say when she finds out she doesn’t have all the answers. OOOOHHH!!! Thank God we have smart scientist who have all the answers, now we’ll all live healthy and forever because of scientist.

    Right, sure we will scientist have solved all our problems haven’t they?

  • DRGB

    Amazing to hear all the capabilities attributed to the little speck of lipo-protein coated RNA they call a “virus”.
    Not only can “viruses” supposedly sicken us, but now a bunch of over-educated idiots are trying to “cure diseases” with them. First, they should explain how this bit of matter thousands of times smaller than a typical cell can “take over” a cell. It has no nucleus nor a means of motility. I believe T.C.Fry’s explanation that what they’re calling a “virus” is actually a mitochondrion of a spent cell. Mitochondria are the powerhouses of our cells. A red blood cell may have a few hundred whereas a muscle cell will have twenty
    to thirty thousand of them. Fry claims that the “flu” is a cleansing of the intestinal tract and a “cold” a cleansing of the respiratory tract. They have no “cure” because they ARE the cure. “Treat” these conditions and you’ll not only prolong them, you’ll turn them into something worse. These “scientists” who are wasting all this grant money can’t name one condition where a so-called “virus” has cured anything, including a ham.