Was Clinton-loving FBI Strzok Also the Agent That Worked with CrowdStrike Tech Company “Proving” the Russian Hacking Narrative?
The FBI never took possession of the “hacked” servers of the DNC and Podesta, but instead relied on Ukrainian 3rd party tech company CrowdStrike’s report to prove Russian election interference.
The CrowdStrike report lead to sanctions against Russia for election interference.
Flynn’s conversation with the ambassador about potential Russian retaliation for those Obama sanctions were conducted by FBI 2nd in charge Peter Strzok who has now been removed from Mueller’s team for his anti-Trump text messages. This same agent changed Comey’s draft language regarding Hillary’s email investigation from “grossly negligent” to “extremely careless.”
So the next piece of information that needs to be uncovered is which FBI agents were the ones to work with this Ukranian (anti-Russian) company CrowdStrike? Comey said in his Congressional testimony that the information was given to him by the agents in charge of that part of the investigation.
WHO WAS IT?
It should be noted that the owner of CrowdStrike is a member of The Atlantic Counsel which selected Hillary Clinton as their person of the year and donated millions to the Clinton Foundation. Obviously CrowdStrike had a horse in the race and would benefit from the Russian collusion narrative if they could help remove Trump with fabricated evidence against Russia. The Dems would next need to link Trump to Russia.
So again WHICH FBI AGENTS WORKED WITH CROWDSTRIKE “PROVING” THE FAKE RUSSIAN HACKING INTERFERENCE without ever securing the evidence?
Comey Congressional Testimony:
BURR: And the FBI in this case, unlike other cases that you might investigate, did you ever have access to the actual hardware that was hacked, or did you have to rely on a third party to provide you the day that that they had collected?
COMEY: In the case of the DNC, and I believe the D triple C, but I’m sure the DNC, we did not have access to the devices themselves. We got relevant forensic information from a private party, a high class entity, that had done the work but we didn’t get direct access.
BURR: But no content.
BURR: Isn’t content an important part of the forensics from a counter-intelligence standpoint?
COMEY: It is but what was briefed to me by the people who were my folks at the time is that they had gotten the information from the private party that they needed to understand the intrusion by the spring of 2016.
h/t duFontaine54 views