Search On This Site

Custom Search


It only takes a few moments to share an article, but the person on the other end who reads it might have his life changed forever
Subscribe via RSS



Contact Information: 
Submit: articles [ at ] investmentwatchblog [dot] com 
Advertising: ads [ at ] investmentwatchblog [dot] com 
General: admin [ at ] investmentwatchblog [dot] com

What Are The Off-White Boxes That Are Going Up On Utility Poles All Over Seattle?


By Michael Snyder

Big Brother - Photo by Mollie

The Big Brother control grid is constantly growing and expanding all over America.  Right now, a “wireless mesh network” is in the process of being installed in Seattle thatsome believe will ultimately have the capability of tracking the location of every wireless device in the city.  If you live in downtown Seattle, just look for the little off-white boxes that are being attached to utility poles all over the place.  You can see a bunch of pictures of these little boxes right here.  Meanwhile, other major U.S. cities have been installing vast networks of surveillance cameras and listening devices.  We are being told that such measures will help police “solve more crime”.  We are being told that such measures will “keep people safe”.  But what about our privacy?  Doesn’t that count for something?  What about the Fourth Amendment?  Are our most cherished liberties and freedoms going to be thrown into the trash just because we live “in a more dangerous world”?

The Stranger is a Seattle newspaper that recently did a major story about this “wireless mesh network” that has been going up all over the city.  What they found out is extremely disturbing…

If you’re walking around downtown Seattle, look up: You’ll see off-white boxes, each one about a foot tall with vertical antennae, attached to utility poles. If you’re walking around downtown while looking at a smartphone, you will probably see at least one—and more likely two or three—Wi-Fi networks named after intersections: “4th&Seneca,” “4th&Union,” “4th&University,” and so on. That is how you can see the Seattle Police Department’s new wireless mesh network, bought from a California-based company called Aruba Networks, whose clients include the Department of Defense, school districts in Canada, oil-mining interests in China, and telecommunications companies in Saudi Arabia.

The question is: How well can this mesh network see you?

How accurately can it geo-locate and track the movements of your phone, laptop, or any other wireless device by its MAC address (its “media access control address”—nothing to do with Macintosh—which is analogous to a device’s thumbprint)? Can the network send that information to a database, allowing the SPD to reconstruct who was where at any given time, on any given day, without a warrant? Can the network see you now?

The Seattle police did not want to talk to the newspaper about this.

Neither did the Department of Homeland Security.

But the newspaper did find some technical experts that actually work with Aruba products that were willing to talk…

After reviewing Aruba’s technical literature, as well as talking to IT directors and systems administrators around the country who work with Aruba products, it’s clear that their networks are adept at seeing all the devices that move through their coverage area and visually mapping the locations of those devices in real time for the system administrators’ convenience. In fact, one of Aruba’s major selling points is its ability to locate “rogue” or “unassociated” devices—that is, any device that hasn’t been authorized by (and maybe hasn’t even asked to be part of) the network.

Which is to say, your device. The cell phone in your pocket, for instance.

The user’s guide for one of Aruba’s recent software products states: “The wireless network has a wealth of information about unassociated and associated devices.” That software includes “a location engine that calculates associated and unassociated device location every 30 seconds by default… The last 1,000 historical locations are stored for each MAC address.”

Will these kinds of systems soon be going up in major cities all across the country?

That is a very good question.

Meanwhile, it has also been revealed that very powerful listening grids have been installed in more than 70 cities around the country…

The Washington Post recently published a feature length article on gunshot detectors, known as ShotSpotter, which detailed how in Washington DC there are now, “at least 300 acoustic sensors across 20 square miles of the city,” microphones wrapped in a weather-proof shell that can detect the location of a sound down to a few yards and analyze the audio using a computer program.

While the systems are touted as “gunshot detectors,” as the New York Times reported in May 2012, similar technology is already installed in over 70 cities around the country, and in some cases it is being used to listen to conversations.

“In at least one city, New Bedford, Mass., where sensors recorded a loud street argument that accompanied a fatal shooting in December, the system has raised questions about privacy and the reach of police surveillance, even in the service of reducing gun violence,” states the report.

That same article from Infowars.com also discussed the “Intellistreets” lighting systems that are being installed around the nation that are capable of listening to and recording conversations on a massive scale…

As we have also previously highlighted, numerous major cities in the Unites States are currently being fitted with Intellistreets ‘smart’ street lighting systems that also have the capability of recording conversations and sending them directly to authorities via wi-fi.

As we reported on Sunday, the Las Vegas Public Works Department has begun testing the devices, which act as surveillance cameras, Minority Report-style advertising hubs, and Homeland Security alert systems. As ABC 7 reported in 2011, they are “also capable of recording conversations.”

If you are reading this article in the downtown area of a major U.S. city, there is a good chance that you are surrounded by a whole host of surveillance cameras, listening devices and automated license plate readers.  The authorities probably already know more about you and your movements than you ever dared to imagine.

And soon we will have thousands of surveillance drones constantly watching us from the skies above.  According to the Washington Times, the FAA is projecting that America’s skies will be filled with up to 7,500 drones five years from now…

The chief of the Federal Aviation Administration predicted Thursday that U.S. airspace could be crowded with as many as 7,500 commercial drones within the next five years, as he unveiled a long-awaited regulatory blueprint that seeks to protect Americans’ privacy while requiring testing for law enforcement and private companies seeking to operate unmanned aerial vehicles.

Well, so what?

Why should we be so concerned about the government watching us?

After all, most of us do not have anything to hide, right?

That is what a man named David Eckert probably thought.  But check out what happened to him after he was stopped for a minor traffic violation in New Mexico

A review of Eckert’s medical records, which he released to KOB, and details in the lawsuit show the following happened:

1. Eckert’s abdominal area was x-rayed; no narcotics were found.

2. Doctors then performed an exam of Eckert’s anus with their fingers; no narcotics were found.

3. Doctors performed a second exam of Eckert’s anus with their fingers; no narcotics were found.

4. Doctors penetrated Eckert’s anus to insert an enema.  Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers.  Eckert watched as doctors searched his stool.  No narcotics were found.

5. Doctors penetrated Eckert’s anus to insert an enema a second time.  Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers.  Eckert watched as doctors searched his stool.  No narcotics were found.

6. Doctors penetrated Eckert’s anus to insert an enema a third time.  Eckert was forced to defecate in front of doctors and police officers.  Eckert watched as doctors searched his stool.  No narcotics were found.

7. Doctors then x-rayed Eckert again; no narcotics were found.

8. Doctors prepared Eckert for surgery, sedated him, and then performed a colonoscopy where a scope with a camera was inserted into Eckert’s anus, rectum, colon, and large intestines.  No narcotics were found.

Throughout this ordeal, Eckert protested and never gave doctors at the Gila Regional Medical Center consent to perform any of these medical procedures.

This is what America is becoming, and it is absolutely disgusting to watch.

Sadly, most Americans don’t seem to care about these things.  They are much more concerned about the fact that Miley Cyrus smoked a joint on stage at the MTV Europe Music Awards on Sunday.

And it is absolutely horrifying to see just how little many Americans actually know about the world around them.  A perfect example of this is a video that Mark Dice just released.  In this video, he talks with young Americans about the “recent death of Martin Luther King” and asks if they are going to go to the funeral…

 

In light of how clueless most of the “sheeple” are, is there any hope left for America?

Please feel free to share what you think by posting a comment below…

All-Seeing Eye

252 Total Views 1 Views Today


Did you already share this? No? Share it now:
  • Martin Maloney

    Turn off WiFi.

    Smartphones and many feature phones have WiFi capability. If
    you’re in a WiFi location, using WiFi for browsing the Web or for
    emailing is free — that is, it doesn’t use up your data allocation on
    your cell plan.

    That’s the good news. The bad news is that, for convenience, many
    (most?) people leave WiFi on continuously. There are two good reasons to
    turn off WiFi when you don’t need to use it:

    1) With WiFi off, you can’t be tracked by WiFi hotspots.

    2) WiFi drains your phone’s battery. By turning off WiFi, except when
    you need it, you will extend your battery time between charges.

    • robertsgt40

      Yep. Your tax dollars at work folks. You’re paying someone to monitor and eventually control you.

      • Vic Demise

        “Eventually?” Hmm…

        • robertsgt40

          I was being politically correct. LOL We’ve been monitored for decades. Just not as thorough.

    • Tim Ireland

      dude , turning off wifi does not stop you being tracked !! wake up man . all CELL/MOBILE systems contracts for license issued via western governments , were only given to the the winning bidders for networks if they installed full tracking software in the earliest stages of cell/mobile network development . i could track you on a 1989 1G phone . cheers

  • againstcorporaterule

    Well, it’s pretty obvious that our govt is NOT protecting us from criminal bankers destroying the world’s economy…hmm…

    And please don’t be fooled by the Seattle Stranger!!!! It’s editors are clearly in the back pocket of the corporate agenda. Just look at bullshit the Seattle Stranger constantly tells it’s readers about fluoride, vaccines and GMO’s and war!!

    ***In their October 16th Voters Guide, the Seattle Stranger literally stated that “the overwhelming scientific consensus is that GMO crops are entirely safe to eat,” (a most sneaky underhanded way of getting into the public mind that if GMO’s are “entirely safe to eat” then there’s really no reason to bother labeling GMO’s -duh!) …hmmm… oh, and just type “vaccines” or better yet, type in “dirty fucking hippies,” in the Seattle Stranger search and see for yourself the classic pharmaceutical propaganda they have to say about vaccines… pretty goddamned nauseating!!***

  • Nyesha Langley

    Wi-Fi is extremely bad for our health, I can feel it and it makes me feel very old and tired, as well as burning my forehead, giving me severe abdominal pain, severe headache, pain in my chest, nausea, dizziness, confusion, depression, anxiety, insomnia, vibrations all over my body, tinnitus in a rhythm, stiffness & weakness of muscles, blurred vision, toothache, nerve pains, hair loss and more. All microwave technology does the same, it harms ALL LIFE, bees die, plants die, just look at those around smart meters and cellular antennas. The government has known about this harm for decades and they are using it to achieve population reduction, I recommend listening to Microwave expert Barrie Trower’s videos on YouTube, he worked with intelligence and his knowledge never fails to shock me.

    • Tim Ireland

      CORRECT !!!! yes its true , in the UK , the governments chief scientific advisor on electronic transmission devices reported that UK WIFI hotspots are far worse for your health than standing POINT BLANK in front of a MOBILE ( CELL ) transmitter . The guy was then sacked ( FIRED / CANNED ) . this is part of the new world order population reduction programme . i still use my mobile phone , but only for 20 mins a week ( NOT 2 HOURS A DAY ) and have my internet hard wired . DO THE SAME AND LIFE !) YEARS PLUS LONGER . big love

  • Janice Goodson

    scary, shocking and seems like the corrupt ones are going to ensure compliance, OR ELSE. Think vaccinations, what is being pumped into our bodies? Think why private sector taking over all UK as well? This is obviously seriously dictators doing their dirty deeds for power, glory and money. One thing they will never gain, is the respect of the majority. Even their own kind, will one day turn on those who think they are some kind of God. They are surely no Gods, just evil, deluded, sadists to do this to humans.

  • Roberta

    guys, if you got together…you know how fast they can be taken down….all at the same time??? just an idea…

  • Skintus_Maximus

    Perhaps this is the reason for the Obamacare RFID…….

  • AmKonDotNet

    You’re all pretty much nuts. It’s just free internet. It’s not the great big bogey man. It’s not “how they get you”. It’s just free internet. Smoke a joint and relax.

    • CAS

      Go ahead and believe the lies. We’ll see who is nuts.

      • Keth Nichel

        AmKonDotNet WAKE UP IDIOT !

  • tech916

    I have mesh networks at my home and soon I will be installing all over a neighborhood